freshpopcorn wrote: » I heard a little bit of the news earlier and there was a woman(sounded young) from the UCC feminists society talking about them wanting to introduce mandatory consent classes for first years. I was like yes fair enough but most people I knew back then had a fair idea what consent was. However she then went onto say she went to a catholic secondary school and she left not knowing what a condom or the pill was. I knew from an early age about condoms were to do with sex but I had a fair idea before we did sex education at the end of primary school. We also briefly covered it in secondary school. Have schools stopped teaching this stuff?Would it be possible you'd get to the age of eighteen and not know what a condom was?
freshpopcorn wrote: » However she then went onto say she went to a catholic secondary school and she left not knowing what a condom or the pill was.
January wrote: » She may not be lying. Catholic ethos schools teach abstinence, they don't give info about contraceptives.
Noveight wrote: » I'd call bullshít on that. Sounds like she's constructing her own experience so it'll help strengthen her argument. If a girl gets to 18 without knowing about condoms or the pill then it's her parents that need to up their game, not necessarily their school.
Odelay wrote: » Both you and ye wan on the radio must be fair old because catholic schools were teaching contraception 25 years ago. They didn't like doing it but they had to do it.
freshpopcorn wrote: » I heard a little bit of the news earlier and there was a woman(sounded young) from the UCC feminists society talking about them wanting to introduce mandatory consent classes for first years. I was like yes fair enough but most people I knew back then had a fair idea what consent was. However she then went onto say she went to a catholic secondary school and she left not knowing what a condom or the pill was. I knew from an early age about condoms were to do with sex but I had a fair idea before we did sex education at the end of primary school. We also briefly covered it in secondary school. Have schools stopped teaching this stuff? Would it be possible you'd get to the age of eighteen and not know what a condom was?
sbsquarepants wrote: » I'm sure it's possible it was never mentioned in her school, but it's not like that's the only place you could ever learn anything. I'd find it totally implausible that in this day and age anyone could reach 18 having never heard of the pill or condoms, from a friend, the telly, on the internet - somewhere!
Grayson wrote: » My mother was a midwife so I was taught those things. Besides that there was late night channel 4. In school there was absolutely nothing at all. We had "retreats" where we were told about how god was part of a relationship. We were told that contraception was against God's law (the same as homosexuality) and that sex should not occur outside marriage. Consent never came into it since it was assumed we wouldn't be having sex until we got married at which point it would become irrelevant. We should have clases in sex education, consent etc. Don't assume that everyone is on the same page or gets the same education from their parents or school. I think in one of the nordic countries they start at a very early age using hugging as an example of consent. There's no reason why we couldn't have something similar here. Age appropriate classes one sex, relationships and sexual health. Editing to add: I went to an all boys school. I'm pretty certain next to none of the guys I went to school knew anything about women's reproductive health. I think the majority of what we knew came from tampon adverts.
eviltwin wrote: » I'm 40 and went to Catholic school. I had two lectures in 3rd year where we learned about periods and pregnancy. No mention of contraception, std's or consent. My daughter, who is 21, also went to a Catholic school and had a similar talk. Sex education should be about more than how babies are made.
freshpopcorn wrote: » Just out of interest what age are you? Most people I know in there twenties/thirties had some form of sex education. One guy I went to school with denies we ever did it tough or that we did SPHE!
Grayson wrote: » I left school in the mid 90's. I also went to what may be the most catholic school in the country. My sister went to a convent school and she got some sex ed, we got none. We had a three hour retreat one night that ran from 6-9. It involved a married couple, who were incredibly religious, telling us about how relationships are sacred and we need to maintain a place for god in the relationship. In another retreat we had a catholic priest tell us that if we had problems or issues with people of the opposite sex, people of our own sex, or with animals we could tell him in confession. I burst out laughing when he said that because i didn't think he was allowed mention sex with animals in front of 15 year olds. (I just googled that priest to see if he'd ever done anything dodgy and can't find a single reference to him). but to get back to the OP's post. Yep, we need standardised classes in consent, sexuality, sexual health, the works.
topper75 wrote: » These schools don't promote them and don't condone their use. Quite different to pretending that they don't exist. So yes, she is lying.Source - first hand. Went to a Catholic school.
Triceratops Ballet wrote: » TBF there's a fair whack of us who went to catholic school, and because there is no sex ed syllabus, it's impossible to know she's definitely lying (unless of course you went to school with her and witnessed her being told)