Mr.H wrote: » Whats next, ban modeling altogether? Surely that is taking advantage of young women and discarding them when they dry out? So yes this is another nail in the coffin for a society of people that think for themselves. Instead we appease the mindless masses who want to be offended by a girl in a pretty dress.
Cool_CM wrote: » According to the FIA release, they will be kids who are already involved in motorsport/karting and their direct family members will have access to the paddock on raceday:https://www.fia.com/news/fia-and-formula-1r-are-pleased-announce-new-partnership-called-grid-kids Time to start thinking about having kids and forcing them into motorsport! :pac:
skipper_G wrote: In theory it's a great idea, in practice it may yet end up a case of who you know that can arrange for little jimmy to be "selected at random". Nevertheless the viewer isn't going to know (or care) if it's some rich kid or not. It has no impact on the racing at all, positive for PR so a sensible choice.
El_Duderino 09 wrote: » I never saw this level of scrutiny of how grid girls were selected. Money talks in all walks of life. Next thing the same principle will apply to an important role like drivers. Little Lance's daddy will pay a team to give his son a drive instead of a faster driver with less money. Oh wait... Seriously guys. The hysteria over grid girls and the sudden interest in how their successors will be selected is beginning to look like a parody of itself. The sooner the season starts and there's some real news to talk about, the better. I'm actually looking forward to the first pre season test where Sauber does a few fast laps and people start speculating about them competing for the title.
El_Duderino 09 wrote: » Pages and pages in lots of threads about grid girls.
Cookie_Monster wrote: » Maybe thats because F1 has become so dull and this is something actually interesting? Or maybe it's simply you and your usual problem with this debate in any form.:rolleyes:
Jordan 199 wrote: » Just one week to go to the first launch of the season.
Harika wrote: » All calm down, the Grid Girls won't be fired, but get a different task instead of the 30 minute grid procedure of the weekend. At least at the RedBull ring.https://www.meinbezirk.at/murtal/sport/die-formula-unas-bleiben-am-ring-d2401276.html German only
Adamocovic wrote: The ones who seem the biggest advocates for it, also coincidentally seem to be involved in the teams that are key to developing it. I remember Lewis was firmly against it, but then his team came out praising it and funding it and he changed his opinion. I know people can change their mind, and nothing against that, but just makes me wonder have the teams who are board convinced or told their drivers to say so too.
Gintonious wrote: » So F1 is getting the Halo. Across the water, Indy Car seem to be getting this, which looks fantastic compared to the Halo. I know F1 tested the screen, and Vettel said it was not working and hurt his eyes. Seems like this version is doing well.
Cork Truck Driver wrote: the halo is going to cause problems if a car ends up being upside down. Can it be removed for driver extractions in the event they are unconscious?
El_Duderino 09 wrote: » Would the screen be any different in that regard? Wouldn't the screen pose the same problems?
Adamocovic wrote: Actually forgot how bulky the halo is. Wonder will there be much variation when the final car designs are released.
Cork Truck Driver wrote: The screen doesn't seem to cover as much of the top end as the Halo does and is less bulky, therefore making an extraction easier.
Deleted User wrote: Did you see the images of the IndyCar screens above?
Cork Truck Driver wrote: » That thing is definitely the way forward, the halo is a load of sh1te! What forces can that screen withstand? The FIA need to work with Vettel and the rest to sort the issue of a screen, the halo is going to cause problems if a car ends up being upside down. Can it be removed for driver extractions in the event they are unconscious?