bk wrote: » I disagree, I have gotten to know my neighbours in a Dublin Apartment building very well. Great community spirit. All the kids play together outside, etc. Just tonight my neighbour from two doors down dropped off a whole large cake!
BoatMad wrote: » good for you , I was arguing for the advantages of urban living , even if I am currently a refugee from suburbia to a rural area ( but was born in a rural area ) curent settlement patterns in rural ireland ( and I include small villages etc ) are completely unsustainable.
BrianBoru00 wrote: » thats fair enough but (1) GOSH was built over 150 years ago when traffic was not the issue it is today and (2) The transport infrastructure for central London is far far superior to that of Dublin . Its about 500 yards from Euston and Kings X train stations, No one is suggesting that the hospital should be anywhere apart from Dublin but its location in Dublin is an issue and to suggest expertise would not accessible if the location were moved 6 miles west is ludicrous
But the reality is that Dublin is the mecca and always will be.
blanch152 wrote: » Future planning requires serious investment in Dublin, Limerick and Cork. In Dublin, it must be public transport and linked to high-rise, high-density development so Dart Underground is vital, followed by Metro North. High-rise on strategic brownfield sites - the Docklands, older industrial estates and areas like the Liberties are vital to take advantage of the investment in public transport. After that, Dublin only needs to develop along the public transport lines. Linking Cork and Limerick is vitally important hence the M20 must be financed. Public transport investment is also required, whether this is focussed on QBCs or Luas given their size. Strategies for Waterford and Galway are also needed, with Galway in particular needing some radical transport solutions. After that, the building-up of commuter towns to those cities - Ennis, Mallow, Tuam - could form part of the plan but places like Westport are too far from anywhere to have a future in the modern world. People won't like to hear that but it is the reality from around the world.
greenpilot wrote: » Hi, I moved from a very built-up Kildare to the West 16 years ago and it is only when you actually move there that you realise the amount of mis-information spouted by folks from the East, particularly Dublin, regarding "Rural Ireland" and all that is involved in residing here. Yes, I am lucky to have had the guts to make the move when I did, and yes, it is sometimes tough to carve out an existence. But the pro's outweigh the con's, in a big way. I work in the Agri-Business sector, Retail end of things. I see, first hand, the day to day trials of rural life and I work in an industry which acts as a great barometer to how life is going "Down the Country", as folks from the East like to call it. First of all, no-one who lives in Rural Ireland, refers to it as, "Rural Ireland". That's just a Dub thing. To everyone here, there is Ireland and then Dublin. That's it. Secondly, I've never played GAA in my entire life and trust me, it has made no difference to my lifestyle or success whatsoever. Outside the Pale, the GAA is not the be-all of everything. It is simply not true. There are many layers to rural life, both economically and socially and the GAA is just a fraction of it, despite what you may think. Thirdly, you would be amazed by the amount of folks from the East Coast and from the UK who are settling in and around the towns and villages west of the shannon. We are getting new customers almost weekly, who have chosen to settle here. These are folks with plenty of disposable cash, and they are spending it. Work is the difficult one, that I admit, but there is work out there. Outside the pale, life is almost self sustainable if you know the tricks, and trust me, you soon learn them. The difference in experiences between folks in the East talking about "rural Ireland" and those of us actually living here is laughable sometimes, but hey!, carry on....we are doing perfectly fine here. Nothing to see!
the_pen_turner wrote: » your point is that we shouldn't spend more foolishly by spending money in area that we don't need to. that applies to building hospitals etc in Dublin city . move it out a bit and save loads of money now and loads in the future . not to mention the tangible benefits to patients and visiters who don't need to drive through the city.
the_pen_turner wrote: » there are lots of things that people in rural Ireland are paying for the urban people aren't . water (we are paying like everyone else through taxation) but lots of us have a well so are paying twice septic tanks . urban people don't have this cost but we are all paying for the treatment plants etc etc we are subsidising urban people with these why cant urban people subsidise us on a few things like broadband
CarlosHarpic wrote: » These kinds of people are driven by one thing only when you really get down to it. The GAA. It always comes down to making sure that the Parish Games have enough players in each muddy rain-soaked field next to a packed church for sunday mass. I have also long suspected that the GAA is unoffically involved in 'sweetening' these kinds of groups. The Catholic Church too. The weaponised Comley Maidiens faction. Apart from their own myopia, they only other function they serve is to hold this country back and make it as expensive as possible.
BoatMad wrote: » Sorry , the facts simply are against your argument , the tax distribution shows clearly that the Greater Dublin area largely subsidies the majority of the rest of the country. You cant separate one or two single things out of a whole mass of tax and costs and there is no etc etc , these two items are about the only thing people can drag up in isolation
D Trent wrote: » A whole host of Banks have, if not are pulling out of towns in cost cutting, Ulster Bank, AIB , BOI etc Dublin people don't even think twice when walking/driving to their local bank. Not a taxation thing I know but these are vital services, I won't bring up the garda station / post office closures
BoatMad wrote: » Services like these were always provided at a cost , all these things cost money , postal service grew because they were needed Today they are not needed as there is a plethora of options I live 150km from my actual Bank Branch where my account is held , its irrelevant Garda stations are a throwback to a different era, whats actually needed is a mobile force, not ones sitting behind a desk . Criminals dont cycle around on bikes robbing farms The debate over post offices and Garda stations and physical banks is entirely misplaced and largely a generational thing, it will be meaningless to our children , rathe like closed rural railway stations are today
the_pen_turner wrote: » I don't believe those facts. how can 1.3million Dubliners generate more tax than the other 3.5 million. there have to a decent tax pull from limerick, cork , Waterford, galway, athlone etc let alone everywhere else. you can spin statistics to show any facts you want. I'm not buying it . all the cities and towns v the rest yes but Dublin v the rest.
the_pen_turner wrote: » I have to agree with you there there is a garda station a few mile down the road. I have never been inside it because they are never there when you want them and they never have any forms or stamps you might need . so you have to go to town anyway so why bother with the mick mouse station same for post office. I have only been in my local post office twice in 3 years. both times were to pay my Vodafone bill after they screwed up the direct debit. I don't know the last time I bought or used a stamp
your point is that we shouldn't spend more foolishly by spending money in area that we don't need to. that applies to building hospitals etc in Dublin city . move it out a bit and save loads of money now and loads in the future . not to mention the tangible benefits to patients and visiters who don't need to drive through the city.
there are lots of things that people in rural Ireland are paying for the urban people aren't .
Harry Palmr wrote: » It's self evident that if people from outside Dublin didn't shop in Dublin the economy of Dublin and the tax take within that area would either shrink if otherwise static or would grow slower. Quite what the spend of Dubs is outside the Pale is open to debate (and that's all as the CEO sure won't have any stats for it)
marno21 wrote: » https://www.rte.ie/news/economy/2018/0205/938359-cabinet-to-meet-on-national-planning-framework/ He is right here. No matter what the rural TDs say there is a major need for concentrated infrastructure investment in urban areas
the_pen_turner wrote: » I think the first thing to work out is why don't rural people want to live in towns and vilages. a few scumbags ruin every village and town we have. noise smells people very near you all the time privacy, nosy neighbours twitching curtains etc etc
Topgear on Dave wrote: » We will see, its this "New Politics" that I dont trust. I think FF will come under a lot of pressure over it, has Leo enough votes to push the plan through the dail?
markodaly wrote: » We keep hearing about issues of broadband, but is the issue more with people in one off housing or ribbon developments having issue with it or are we talking those in towns, villages having issues. I think it would be the former, so why then do we not talk about the way rural Ireland has been developed and say correctly that such developments should be outlawed and banned.
cgcsb wrote: » Just stop. You aren't paying the actual cost of your septic tank.
the_pen_turner wrote: » what do you mean every one with a septic tank had to pay to install it pay when ever it neeeed maintenance will have to pay regularly for it to be emptied have to unblock any blockages them selves or pay . public can ring council once its outside their property pay to replace the tank or percolation down the line when it stops working what exactly are we not paying
cgcsb wrote: » Septic tanks, the vast majority of them, only provide the basic primary treatment and they discharge into the water table and pollute our rivers with high BOD water, which the tax payer then has to clean up. Many of them aren't working and their owners don't give a hoot, there are no inspections. In order for the full cost of something as primitive as a standard septic tank to be paid for by the user you'd have to have one of the newer machines that provide secondary treatment and you'd have to pay for a bi-annual inspection from your council. But alas we don't keep those standards in this country as it'd be too expensive for your ilk, so we just throw in more indirect subsidy.