the_pen_turner wrote: » I don't believe those facts. how can 1.3million Dubliners generate more tax than the other 3.5 million. there have to a decent tax pull from limerick, cork , Waterford, galway, athlone etc let alone everywhere else. you can spin statistics to show any facts you want. I'm not buying it . all the cities and towns v the rest yes but Dublin v the rest.
BoatMad wrote: » Services like these were always provided at a cost , all these things cost money , postal service grew because they were needed Today they are not needed as there is a plethora of options I live 150km from my actual Bank Branch where my account is held , its irrelevant Garda stations are a throwback to a different era, whats actually needed is a mobile force, not ones sitting behind a desk . Criminals dont cycle around on bikes robbing farms The debate over post offices and Garda stations and physical banks is entirely misplaced and largely a generational thing, it will be meaningless to our children , rathe like closed rural railway stations are today
D Trent wrote: » A whole host of Banks have, if not are pulling out of towns in cost cutting, Ulster Bank, AIB , BOI etc Dublin people don't even think twice when walking/driving to their local bank. Not a taxation thing I know but these are vital services, I won't bring up the garda station / post office closures
BoatMad wrote: » Sorry , the facts simply are against your argument , the tax distribution shows clearly that the Greater Dublin area largely subsidies the majority of the rest of the country. You cant separate one or two single things out of a whole mass of tax and costs and there is no etc etc , these two items are about the only thing people can drag up in isolation
CarlosHarpic wrote: » These kinds of people are driven by one thing only when you really get down to it. The GAA. It always comes down to making sure that the Parish Games have enough players in each muddy rain-soaked field next to a packed church for sunday mass. I have also long suspected that the GAA is unoffically involved in 'sweetening' these kinds of groups. The Catholic Church too. The weaponised Comley Maidiens faction. Apart from their own myopia, they only other function they serve is to hold this country back and make it as expensive as possible.
the_pen_turner wrote: » there are lots of things that people in rural Ireland are paying for the urban people aren't . water (we are paying like everyone else through taxation) but lots of us have a well so are paying twice septic tanks . urban people don't have this cost but we are all paying for the treatment plants etc etc we are subsidising urban people with these why cant urban people subsidise us on a few things like broadband
the_pen_turner wrote: » your point is that we shouldn't spend more foolishly by spending money in area that we don't need to. that applies to building hospitals etc in Dublin city . move it out a bit and save loads of money now and loads in the future . not to mention the tangible benefits to patients and visiters who don't need to drive through the city.
greenpilot wrote: » Hi, I moved from a very built-up Kildare to the West 16 years ago and it is only when you actually move there that you realise the amount of mis-information spouted by folks from the East, particularly Dublin, regarding "Rural Ireland" and all that is involved in residing here. Yes, I am lucky to have had the guts to make the move when I did, and yes, it is sometimes tough to carve out an existence. But the pro's outweigh the con's, in a big way. I work in the Agri-Business sector, Retail end of things. I see, first hand, the day to day trials of rural life and I work in an industry which acts as a great barometer to how life is going "Down the Country", as folks from the East like to call it. First of all, no-one who lives in Rural Ireland, refers to it as, "Rural Ireland". That's just a Dub thing. To everyone here, there is Ireland and then Dublin. That's it. Secondly, I've never played GAA in my entire life and trust me, it has made no difference to my lifestyle or success whatsoever. Outside the Pale, the GAA is not the be-all of everything. It is simply not true. There are many layers to rural life, both economically and socially and the GAA is just a fraction of it, despite what you may think. Thirdly, you would be amazed by the amount of folks from the East Coast and from the UK who are settling in and around the towns and villages west of the shannon. We are getting new customers almost weekly, who have chosen to settle here. These are folks with plenty of disposable cash, and they are spending it. Work is the difficult one, that I admit, but there is work out there. Outside the pale, life is almost self sustainable if you know the tricks, and trust me, you soon learn them. The difference in experiences between folks in the East talking about "rural Ireland" and those of us actually living here is laughable sometimes, but hey!, carry on....we are doing perfectly fine here. Nothing to see!
blanch152 wrote: » Future planning requires serious investment in Dublin, Limerick and Cork. In Dublin, it must be public transport and linked to high-rise, high-density development so Dart Underground is vital, followed by Metro North. High-rise on strategic brownfield sites - the Docklands, older industrial estates and areas like the Liberties are vital to take advantage of the investment in public transport. After that, Dublin only needs to develop along the public transport lines. Linking Cork and Limerick is vitally important hence the M20 must be financed. Public transport investment is also required, whether this is focussed on QBCs or Luas given their size. Strategies for Waterford and Galway are also needed, with Galway in particular needing some radical transport solutions. After that, the building-up of commuter towns to those cities - Ennis, Mallow, Tuam - could form part of the plan but places like Westport are too far from anywhere to have a future in the modern world. People won't like to hear that but it is the reality from around the world.
But the reality is that Dublin is the mecca and always will be.
BrianBoru00 wrote: » thats fair enough but (1) GOSH was built over 150 years ago when traffic was not the issue it is today and (2) The transport infrastructure for central London is far far superior to that of Dublin . Its about 500 yards from Euston and Kings X train stations, No one is suggesting that the hospital should be anywhere apart from Dublin but its location in Dublin is an issue and to suggest expertise would not accessible if the location were moved 6 miles west is ludicrous
BoatMad wrote: » good for you , I was arguing for the advantages of urban living , even if I am currently a refugee from suburbia to a rural area ( but was born in a rural area ) curent settlement patterns in rural ireland ( and I include small villages etc ) are completely unsustainable.
bk wrote: » I disagree, I have gotten to know my neighbours in a Dublin Apartment building very well. Great community spirit. All the kids play together outside, etc. Just tonight my neighbour from two doors down dropped off a whole large cake!
BoatMad wrote: » and having neighbours close is often an advantage especially unlike Dublin,, you might be likely to actually know your neighbour
Podge_irl wrote: » GOSH is located beside the national centre for neurology and is in a city centre location almost completely inaccessible by car. Copying the example of GOSH would leave the NCH exactly where it is. The NCH will be a teaching hospital but it will obviously only have pediatric specialties - having access to other specialties is important. Which is essentially the core of the whole Dublin argument. It is the location that has the critical mass necessary to entice other people there. Dublin will continue to grow and that is that. Now, investment could (and should) certainly be made in other urban areas such as Cork or Limerick, but this will also come at the expense of rural Ireland moreso than Dublin. Investment is going to increasingly be in urban areas as it is where you get the best bang for your buck.
martingriff wrote: » Perhaps but if we don't go upgrading and promoting other areas then that is how it will stay. Dublin should not be the only place. Limerick, Cork, Galway have a whole lot to give eg: airports, university, a wealth of people. This Dublin or bust just because it stupid and can stop Ireland's competitiveness
the_pen_turner wrote: » I think the first thing to work out is why don't rural people want to live in towns and vilages. a few scumbags ruin every village and town we have. noise smells people very near you all the time privacy, nosy neighbours twitching curtains etc etc
Doltanian wrote: » We are much closer to America in this policy, Irish love their Space and living in towns and cities is prohibitively expensive because our planners refuse to build upwards. I live in almost 400 acres in our house and farm my great grand parents fought the English for. What rural Ireland needs more than anything else is fibre optic broadband and improved access to the cities for commuting ideally not by car.
snotboogie wrote: » In fairness Varadkar has been excellent in what he says on this topic, let's hope he stays strong and follows through.
marno21 wrote: » https://www.rte.ie/news/economy/2018/0205/938359-cabinet-to-meet-on-national-planning-framework/ He is right here. No matter what the rural TDs say there is a major need for concentrated infrastructure investment in urban areas