Deleted User wrote: » No there wouldn't. Not for a known gun importer, terrorist, attempted murderer and viewer of child pornography. Seriously, someone like that should be extremely well-known to every Garda around. The ****ing FBI were investigating him at one stage FFS.
julyjane wrote: » Yes that's the one I was referring to. Dalkey/Dun Laoighre I'm not sure which
Ash.J.Williams wrote: » you're right it's dalkey
....... wrote: » This post has been deleted.
MrJones1973 wrote: » Im not saying men did not try it on in stupid and illegal ways in the past but teens did not meet up on apps with total strangers looking for sex . Some might say there is no harm. I dont
MrJones1973 wrote: » I think a lot of you are deluded if you think its positive for kids teens to meet up and have sex with strangers for very obvious reasons. I don't think it was common practice for teens to meet strangers in disco s and pool halls and have sex with them. Back in the 1980s. I wonder what impact these apps will have on their emotional development ? Most teenage girls regret losing virginity at a young age Perhaps you might say im an old fart but nobody will convince me that a wham bam thank you mam teenage culture is a positive. We already have to teach kids its not ok to have sex with a comatose girl. God knows whats next!!
MrJones1973 wrote: » Nobody is in favour of teenage pregnancies but that had more to do with lack of condoms than anything else. Of course people always had sex as teenagers but it was less not more in the 1980s. Your personal sex life is your personal sex life. I really dont want to hear about it! 14-16 year olds hooking up looking for porn sex is a recipe for disaster. Then we wonder why we have to teach consent in schools and women wonder why they are mainly seen as sex objects ? Why teenage anxiety is constantly rising? Pedophiles having a great time on various apps I suppose is just collateral damage? You reap what you sow I might be old fashioned but trust me you wont like where this is heading I wont comment further. Ill leave you to mop up the mess
MrJones1973 wrote: » and women wonder why they are mainly seen as sex objects ?
Pawwed Rig wrote: » MrJones1973 wrote: » and women wonder why they are mainly seen as sex objects ? I don't think women actually do outside of media and internet.
MrJones1973 wrote: » Perhaps you have some point on consent. But its amazing how convinced liberals are that every thing is fine with wall to wall porn. Kids screwing around with strangers . Various apps. Abortion. Etc naked photos on facebook Their level of arrogance and self assurance about the new orthodoxy is quite similar to that held by conservatives in the 1980s. We will do doubt ape the uk. Wonderful. With its 50 per cent divorce rate. One in five pregnancies aborted. Best of luck with the self assurance
Calina wrote: » See the highlighted line up there? This tells me you can safely be ignored. Such a total generalisation and misrepresentation of a group of people that you choose to label as other to you means you don't actually think too much about the root causes of the issues that concern you. Some of the heaviest use of porn sites come from states in the US which are particularly repressed or conservative. Don't assume the only the liberals - as you call the - are the only ones using porn. The highest rates of teen pregnancy in the US were typically in those states which tend a) more evangelical b) more GOP and c) least access to abortion and contraception. I'm going to be blunt and suggest that while the UK is not perfect - far from it - the fact remains that it is no skin off your nose if a woman has an abortion, or sex. And the biggest problem in terms of reducing unwanted abortions is that people like you are also massively against sex and relationship education, misrepresent those who want it as desiring wall to wall porn. No one in Ireland calls other people liberals unless they are influenced by the political system in America and there are not so many of them. If you do not want people to have abortions, you need to a) give women plenty of money in recognition of the contribution they make to society by having children - clue - no country really does this, not even the northern Europeans although they are generally the most supporting and b) stop punishing them and shaming the when they have babies out of line with your expectations, ie, when they are single, when they are teenagers, when they are lesbians or trans or bisexual. Your view that you can judge other people for their behaviour and dismiss them as arrogant is tantamount to complaining about the mote in another's eyes when you cannot see the plank in your own. PS: rape within marriage was legal within this country was legal until the 1990s. Women who get raped were historically slutshamed. I may not have a point about consent. I have a point a point consent. Women who weren't asked didn't really get a chance to say no did they, and as recently as within the last 2 years a radio presenter in this country was implying that marriage was a defacto yes to sex at all times.
THE NUMBER OF teenage pregnancies has fallen by 64% in 15 years. Earlier this year, figures released by the CSO showed a decrease in the number of teenage births from 3,087 in 2001 to 1,098 in 2016. This equates to a decrease in the teen birth rate from 20 per 1,000 of females aged 15-19 in Ireland in 2001 to 7.8 per 1,000 in 2016.
Billy86 wrote: » It should also be said that something largely lost in the noise of "kids these days" is that teen pregnancies have been falling by a large amount for a long period of time - http://www.thejournal.ie/teenage-pregnancy-ireland-3700903-Dec2017/ And that's despite the population going from 3.9mn (2002 census) to 4.75mn in 2016 - with the economy I'd guess we're probably quite comfortably above 4.8mn by now.
lalababa wrote: » The Gards have terrorised one family and seem hell bent on doing it to a second , 30+ years on, when the Gards responsible are dead or retired. What is the motive.
lalababa wrote: » What is the motive.
