Subcomandante Marcos wrote: » Lads I'm calling it, Conor will be announced as fighting Diaz in June (Event location still not announced, one of only 2 PPV events this year without a location confirmed) in Vegas for "Fight Week" in July with the winner fighting the winner of Tony vs Khabib. They'll spin some ****e about how they HAD to do Tony vs Khabib because of the history of the fight and how it NEEDS to happen blah blah and then they'll justify the McGregor Diaz fight as some sort of fight as some sort of "gift" to the fans because Conor wants to come back but it's too close to the Khabib vs Tony fight for the winner to get the nod, especially if Khabib wins.
dulux99 wrote: » I just can't see why the UFC or McGregor himself would waste one of his rare UFC fights on a Russian event. Gate receipts they'd pull in Vegas or NYC with McGregor headlining would dwarf anything they could ever dream of doing in Russia, it wouldn't even come close.
Paully D wrote: » "hewhoscares wrote: » It would be hilarious if Khabib refused to fight Conor if he wins. Demands he earns his shot and proves he can turn up. Khabib will do what he’s told.
"hewhoscares wrote: » It would be hilarious if Khabib refused to fight Conor if he wins. Demands he earns his shot and proves he can turn up.
Mellor wrote: » hewhoscares wrote: » Yeah Lineal does me something - the man who beat the man who beat the man. but in the same way Whittaker Vs Romero was the fight against the two best MWs at that period, Khabib and Tony is the same. Conor is not just the lineal though. He is the current LW champion. The MW situation differs because Whitaker was promoted from Interim to Champion in december.
hewhoscares wrote: » Yeah Lineal does me something - the man who beat the man who beat the man.
dashoonage wrote: » Khabib beats Tony....Mcnugget stripped and Khabib becomes the undisputed champ. Khabib cant fight in July. So Mcnugget vs The Nate in June for the interim belt. Mcnugget wins. UFC fight night Moscow becomes a numbered event and we have Khabib vs Mcnugget Dana suffers from cardiac arrest dude to thinking about the amount of money he would make Bisping takes his place as the overlord of the UFC Fires Yoel Romero.....just in case.
mdwexford wrote: » You realise calling him McNugget makes you sound mentally challenged right?
Tanjee83 wrote: » Hmmmm...... so it's more confusing with Dana not specifying what is going on. Anyone else think the UFC will implement multiple champs in a division to then create a super title? Or have lineal champs, like in boxing?
Useful.Idiot wrote: » No, can't see this happening. The possible reasons I see the UFC being so ambiguous about the belt: A - They need to maintain Conor's official status as LW champ for as long as possible, for promotional/other reasons, before UFC 223. B - Conor could be looking to come back sooner than September, and is still in negotiations with the UFC. They want to keep him champ in case Tony or Khabib pulls out. Or worse, they'll do Conor vs Nate for the belt on the same card or in may/june. Though that wouldn't be so bad if he was stripped before that, leaving Khabib/Tony the undisputed champ. C - UFC aren't going to strip him at all. I find this unlikely.
hewhoscares wrote: » Yes but just because the UFC arbitrarily decides that Whittakers belt is more important, GSP is still lineal at MW. But right now the two best LW fighters in the world as proven by their results over a period of time are Tony and Khabib
Effects wrote: » I thought McNuggets only referred to McGregor fans constantly on his balls. Like the ones who think if he's stripped of his title that he's still the real champ as he has the physical belt at home.
Jim Bob Scratcher wrote: » Fanboys are the worst
Mellor wrote: » I think it's much simpler. If they strip him now, and then Tony or Khabib gets injured. They are left with no champion and no title fights. Given Tony v Khabib has fallen through 2 or 3 times. I think they are being cautious..
weldoninhio wrote: » If McGregor is stripped now, Tony becomes champion. Same way the interim champ became champ when he was stripped of the other belt. Or have I missed something?
Useful.Idiot wrote: » No champion to fight on UFC 223
Mellor wrote: » He would become champ. And if he then got injured, they'd have achieved nothing. In fact they be in a worse spot. Exactly.
weldoninhio wrote: » If he got injured he'd come back and defend. McGregor has been sitting on his arse for how long now, uninjured, refusing to defend. Can't see how having a champ who wants to defend, but is injured, is worse than one that refuses to defend at all.
dulux99 wrote: » I cringe whenever someone calls him "McNugget". Probably the most unimaginative nickname I've ever heard. Ye can do better than that lads ffs
Mellor wrote: » dulux99 wrote: » I cringe whenever someone calls him "McNugget". Probably the most unimaginative nickname I've ever heard. Ye can do better than that lads ffs It reminds of the pure cringe moment when Cole Miller called him McGoober. That was embarrassing. He dodged a bullet getting injured I think.
Deleted User wrote: » https://www.reddit.com/r/ireland/comments/7slipp/cant_wait_to_see_woke_men_in_repeal_jumpers/ Conor McGregor is DJing at Electric Picnic :pac:
Mellor wrote: » It reminds of the pure cringe moment when Cole Miller called him McGoober. That was embarrassing. He dodged a bullet getting injured I think.
hewhoscares wrote: » You're aware that poster is a pisstake right?