the sheriff is HERE wrote: » i wasn't a hutch supporter at the start, i didn't care, but the more the easier targets were killed and innocent because Daniel and liam want revenge, while getting lackeys to done their dirty work, has made me a hutch supporter and kinahan hater.
the sheriff is HERE wrote: » has made me a hutch supporter and kinahan hater.
Omackeral wrote: » Why would you actively support them though. They're a drain on society. Why not just take an interest?
Atlantic Dawn wrote: » What would be the % share each side has in the drugs trade in Ireland?
the sheriff is HERE wrote: » 99.9% kinahan 0.01% north inner city gang.(respective areas) apparently kinahan worth a billion, assets and cash total, the monk roughly 10 million.
humberklog wrote: » I know we laugh at the monikers given to the criminals but Mr. Big (won't say real name here) on the Northside is and had been for years feeding drugs into N.C.Dublin up to Louth, Meath, Monaghan and Cavan is supplying a lot more than 0.01% of drugs into Ireland and his supply has been shown in the past to be not dependent on the cartel. As for you supporting the Hutch side of the gang in this campaign it doesn't make sense to think that it's the Monk and his gang versus the Kinehan Cartel. His family members were involved with the cartel until it went pear shaped. The extended Hutch family and friends were part of the cartel for years.
Rumpy Pumpy wrote: » Does anyone know which side Billy ‘Baked Beans’ ,the butcher of Balbriggan is aligned to?
the sheriff is HERE wrote: » Gardai are looking for any information in relation to two black cars. 1st 05CE1675 A black VW GOLF, 1.9 TDI, 5 DOOR. found burnt out at, Crag Avenue Business Park, Crag Ave, Clondalkin. 2nd. 04D72956 A BLACK TOYOTA AVENSIS 1.8 PETROL discovered, snowdrop walk, Darndale at 6.25pm 20 of January 2018.
a black Volkswagen Golf which was set on fire before transferring to a black Toyota Avensis
the sheriff is HERE wrote: » The monk seems, ODC(ordinary decent criminal)i dont know the man, helping his community,.
the sheriff is HERE wrote: » the Kinahans, money, corruption, killing at will,easy targets, their flashness, the calling on debts and make people killers, rather than go for regancy assault team or even stay here. .
Atlantic Dawn wrote: » As usual the fake news RTE gives a brutal and useless description of the cars should someone have actually seen them...
the sheriff is HERE wrote: » i searched out both regs plates they're real. ONLY BECAUSE OF THE MOTORS FORUM ON BOARDS.IE AND ITS POSTERS.
Atlantic Dawn wrote: » Yes I searched them too, you would imagine RTE would have full details of model and spec but no, amateur hour, bloody useless. A black Golf could literally be around 50 different car models based on version, 3/5 door, estate etc.
Odhinn wrote: » He's an evil bollix with an ego the size of a large house. Complete nuts, meglomanaical , evil, and likewise full of their own bull****. Given a pass by some as they didn't hail from the usual deprived areas, and look how that worked out.
Pintman Paddy Losty wrote: » Beansy skipped town last year. He was pally with both sides before the fued. Daniel reckons he might have been a threat and working for the other side. Himself and gitzo headed to the costa and have been keeping a low profile. My sources say he was home at christmas though.
the sheriff is HERE wrote: » i didn't know the monk was that,
Odhinn wrote: » That accurately describes most "big" criminals.
the sheriff is HERE wrote: » He is pure old school apparently,..........
Rumpy Pumpy wrote: » I’m not very au fait with these crime figures, but had heard that he was an up-and-coming figure in the Dublin underworld. Came from a really solid middle class family, but fell in with the wrong crowd. Meant to be very violent when he was off his head on moon biscuits. Surely the costa del crime isn’t the best place for him if he’s fallen foul of the K-Crew? Is that not their base of operations?
Odhinn wrote: » If you knew what "old school" actually entailed, you wouldn't be writing that as a compliment. I'd suggest taking up fiction writing. Jesus knows paul williams made enough off of it.
Pintman Paddy Losty wrote: » Yeah, that's right. Beanso was an diamond bloke as a young fella. Was actually a talented kid, good footballer and was close to making the Dublin minor team. Coulda had a swell life if things hadda turned out different. He got in with a group of bad hombres. Before you knew the kid was hooked on the devils dandruff. Ended up in the big house after taking the rap for one of the gunsels higher up the chain cause he wasn't no stool pigeon. People on the streets say he's gone to the costa, but that's not literal. It's a metaphor for laying low. Catch my drift?
the sheriff is HERE wrote: » hit one in the arm, two in the head, from a shotgun, a 3 shot shotgun, or reloaded? they usually use automatic pistols, is there a automatic shotgun available?
hatrickpatrick wrote: » To be fair, a lot of people believe that whoever fires the first unprovoked shot in a dispute is automatically the worse of the two regardless of what comes after. To people who believe that, the fact that the first victim of this feud was a Hutch killed by the Kinahans for something he apparently didn't actually do, means that the Kinahans are automatically the bigger bad guys here and the Hutches are the more righteous of the two (in that context, given that their hit on the Regency was motivated by vengeance for their relative and not simply unprovoked, senseless violence). It's not PC and it goes against what most Irish people are taught about vengeance, forgiveness, two wrongs don't make a right etc, but I think on a fundamental level a lot of people still believe this to at least some extent. As a kid, if someone is caught fighting with their sibling their instinctive justification is "but he hit me first". On some level, a lot of people regard whoever starts a fight as the person more deserving of getting their ass kicked in it. Most people I know who aren't from either of the areas involved would tend to sympathise more with the Hutches for this reason - because if the media narrative is true (and one of the reasons I hesitate to form an opinion on which side is worse than the other is because I have a huge mistrust of the media's accuracy in reporting these feuds), then the Kinahans started the war by killing a Hutch for no reason at all, and therefore the Regency hit was just desserts for them. Personally, I don't know anyone involved and I have years of first hand experience of how the media distorts reality, so I'm not inclined to assume anything at all is true about this conflict - hence my post a few pages ago about the deceased David Byrne's avengers being more their own crew with their own resources and agenda, than simply "people who take orders from the Kinahans" as the media portray them.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w4.vanillicon.com/v2/4c2f272c464d99a9eee64a80fbe71a0c.svg)
