Carnacalla wrote: » 747 inbound SNN. 19,000ft and decending. Stobart about to turn for approach, wind 240 degrees 40kts G 49kts.
Lost4Life wrote: » I was on the 10pm Aer Lingus from LHR. Very bumpy coming in. Was sure a go around was on the cards.
Lost4Life wrote: » FR8997 diverted
Irish Steve wrote: » It's possible that the quote that was posted on Boards (Can't find it right now, it might have been in the weather forum) was not the original, but as posted here, the specific wording stated "BREAKING Action", and it should have been BRAKING action. It's a very common and thoroughly irritating error that gets made on a regular basis in places like the motoring forum, but in aviation, which has very clearly laid down standard words, to a pilot who does not have English as his primary language, breaking and breaking could mean 2 very different things, and possibly cause significant confusion. I'd like to hope that the error in the report was due to a mis type here, but given the complexity of the report, I would be of the opinion that it was a cut and paste from the original report.
SNOWTAM 16 JAN 2018 22:10 FROM: A) EIDW 01162210 C) 10 F) 5/5/5 G) 02/02/02 T) RUNWAY 10/28 AND 100 PERCENT CONTAMINATED WITH SNOW. BREAKING ACTIONS NO LONGER AVAILABLE. RUNWAY SURFACE CONDITIONS ASSESSED BY DEPTH READINGS AND PILOT REPORTS. ALL AREAS CONTAMINATED WITH SNOW
smurfjed wrote: » Gaoth Laidir is there more to that SNOWTAM?
smurfjed wrote: » Thanks, but rather than focusing on breaking versus braking, what exactly is that SNOWTAM telling us. I would have expected something more specific that I can decode to have some meaning.
Pat Dunne wrote: » Virgin G_VLIP diverting to DUB expected 10:30 approx.
Gaoth Laidir wrote: » It's just passed over my house at FL100 but the noise from it was thunderous. Sounded more like it was just taking off at about 3000 ft overhead.
KwackerJack wrote: » Any ideas of take off?
JCX BXC wrote: » Where was it going to and coming from? Any flight number?
md323 wrote: » Ryanair Learjet descending into Shannon?
sparrowcar wrote: » Pushing back any minute.
CharlieCroker wrote: » BA837 DUB-LHR diverted to LGW. Anyone have any info
BZ wrote: » Heathrow holding very busy this evening. Diverted to LGW due to low fuel.
Doltanian wrote: » Pretty pathetic that they wouldn't load enough fuel on board knowing what Heathrow is like.
JCX BXC wrote: » Are you sure? Most aircraft were only doing 1-2 rounds, seems highly unusual to do those 2 rounds and then divert.