mariaalice wrote: » That retired Garda who still believes she was the mother of the two babies despite all the evidence to the contrary what on earth is going on there he is completely delusional.
SEPT 23 1989 wrote: » In any other country that fcuking headcase would be now stripped of his pension and jailed over his behaviour
splinter65 wrote: » Wants both babies exhumed and Scotland Yard brought in to investigate. No regard or respect for Ms Hayes. No respect or regard for the remains of either baby. Just cannot tolerate the idea that he was wrong because as far as he’s concerned he’s never been wrong in his life. It’s all about him. Unbearable irishness from beginning to end.
Ipso wrote: » I wonder if it's pure pig sh1t thickness or were they protecting one of our betters.
Odhinn wrote: » It's not impossible, but it seems more thickery than anything else. Had somebody "important" been involved, they would have tried to do a better job of hanging her.
splinter65 wrote: » The main objective in the investigation from the very start was that no “decent family” man who had been lured into an occasion of sin by the temptress J Hayes, would have his “good name” and that of his family, tarnished by being named in the scandal . I can garauntee you 100% that neither of the fathers of these 2 babies will ever be revealed. Make no mistake though, this was the Gardai acting on behalf of the vast majority of the local community.
....... wrote: » This post has been deleted.
Deleted User wrote: » Joanne’s baby was stillborn.
Huexotzingo wrote: » Retired garda believes Joanne Hayes had twins, calls for exhumation :rolleyes::mad:
mariaalice wrote: » Most likely he is arrogant combined with an always right personality its become ingrained in him that he and his colleges were correct and he cant let it go.
erica74 wrote: » I think that people need to discuss this case without continuing to mention that lady by name. I think it's appalling that everytime the case is brought up, her name and picture is splashed across the front page of every red top. When she and her family confessed to the murder and later recanted, I have no clear idea why they did that and I'm not going to speculate but the gardai seem satisfied that she and her family had nothing to do with it so her name should be left out of the discussion. I grew up in Abbeydorney myself and it's a tragic case and what this lady was put through and continues to go through is shocking and disgraceful.
[Deleted User] wrote: » Gerry O’ Carroll should shut up considering the farce of the previous investigation - how insensitive can you get, even in retirement. :rolleyes:
Summer wind wrote: » There was obviously a tremendous rage in whoever killed poor little baby John. How could anybody hate a little baby so much. I couldn't even imagine it. Such a very sad case.
Atoms for Peace wrote: » You really do have to question the motivations of why this story has been dredged up again despite evidence being there for the past twenty years.
Guy:Incognito wrote: » What was the deal with the child the family buried on their land? Was that common practice or What? It seems to get a passing mention on the news like it was an incidental thing.
skylight1987 wrote: » this lady illegally buried her baby on her land .she wouldn't even give him the decency of a proper burial. didn't even register a name .yes she was wronged by the gardai in relation to the other baby but what she did to her own flesh and blood was cruel .no one bothers to mention this now though .the only people I feel sorry for are both babies .