dashoonage wrote: » I heard Dana is sending Ngannou to collect the belt.
Subcomandante Marcos wrote: » Nobody hands back the belt. There's a new one for every title fight.
Lukker- wrote: » Continuing on from chat in the general chat? If he does get stripped, does the Champions clause still apply?
Useful.Idiot wrote: » I'd probably trust anonymous Russian sources close to Khabib over anything Ali Abdelaziz says.
JohnMc1 wrote: » Even if the champion's clause would no longer apply to him, where could he go if he decides to leave the UFC. No other MMA business can pay him what he wants and even if he decided to Box full time they're not going to pay him that much to fight guys at his experience level. Sure he can probably have the rematch with Floyd, maybe Pac, but accumulating nothing but L's is a great is a great way to crash and burn your value.
Deleted User wrote: » I doubt the UFC want to strip Conor, he is worth more to them as a champion. But they definitely want/need him to fight twice per calendar year for their bottom line. I think the threat to strip is to get him to fight Khabib in April. It's a risky move for them because he's wealthy enough to walk away if he feels disrespected. But I think he'll agree to fight Khabib soon.
Subcomandante Marcos wrote: » Even if the "champions clause" doesn't apply to him, he's still under contract.
JohnMc1 wrote: » He's not worth anything to them at the moment since he won't fight.
JoeyJJ wrote: » So UFC3 will be out early Feb with him with 2 belts on it and he will have none at the time of release.
dashoonage wrote: » UFC3: Stripped
Deleted User wrote: » That's a very simplistic way of looking at a complicated business. Assets don't lose all their value just because they temporarily stop generating revenue. Conor is a viewed as an asset by the UFC, the same as all their fighters. The value of an asset goes up and down for various reasons. Conor's value to the UFC is higher as champion. They want their cash cows to be champions, it's how they operate, it's why their match-making is often ludicrous. So stripping him is not something they will do lightly. However as I said above they are definitely frustrated by his inactivity. They want him to be fighting semi-regularly and generating income. It's why this is an interesting risk on their part.
JohnMc1 wrote: » You're agreeing with me under the guise of disagreeing with me then. Conor isn't worth anything to them at the moment since he's not fighting. Therefore he's not selling tickets and he's not selling PPVs [which are going up to $65 for 220 and on]. Conor has no value to them at the moment since he won't fight.
JohnMc1 wrote: » Lukker- wrote: » Continuing on from chat in the general chat? If he does get stripped, does the Champions clause still apply? Even if the champion's clause would no longer apply to him, where could he go if he decides to leave the UFC.
monty_python wrote: » Just an idea. He could fight as an independent fighter, not contracted to the UFC or anyone else. Then he would be free to fight/co promote against UFC fighters or any boxers and promote his own lads in sbg under mc Gregor promotions
[Deleted User] wrote: » Down the back of a halting site somewhere..
weldoninhio wrote: » And now for the main event of the night. It’s Micko vs Jackser to find out who gets Jacinta.