mach1982 wrote: God the Father is the God of Abraham and Issac.(matthew 22 :32)
Je_suis_Jean wrote: Regardless, let's assume they leave it to their death bed to genuinely repent, are they forgiven and welcomed into the glorious kingdom or not?
fkx2nspcw9omhg wrote: » God is God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit. There is no other God.
God wrote: 32 ‘I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob’[a]? He is not the God of the dead but of the living.”
fkx2nspcw9omhg wrote: » Why would you vote yes and then go to confession soon after? I don't think that would be a genuine confession.
keano_afc wrote: » "Every human embryologist in the world knows that the life of the new individual HUMAN BEING begins at fertilisation. It is not belief, it is scientific fact". Ward Kishcer, University of Arizona.
YFlyer wrote: Plenty of Christians for the death penalty.
Je_suis_Jean wrote: » Why don't you address the question I asked? Can a christian who had educated himself/herself on the issue of abortion and votes in favour of unlimited abortion (for whatever reasons you may not be able to comprehend) but later genuinely respents be forgiven by god or not?
Bubbaclaus wrote: That's unfortunate for you, as you follow the exact same god. Are you claiming you follow a false god?
Bubbaclaus wrote: Seek forgiveness now or you will not be allowed enter his kingdom.
fkx2nspcw9omhg wrote: » Unfortunately, Muslims follow a false God, and will receive their just reward.
Je_suis_Jean wrote: Cool, that finally answers the OPs question ie "YES" christians can indeed vote in favour of unlimited abortion safe in the knowledge that providing they go to confession or whatever soon after and genuinely repent, including saying the three hail mary's they'll likely get for punishment (I always found the concept of being told to say prayers as a form of punishment a bit odd) then all will be hunky dory all round and a Win Win for everyone.
LeeroyJ. wrote: Well good thing i am an atheist and can vote for autonomy and a fundamental human right. And i sincerely hope there are enough other people that can distance themselves from religious BS and make a decision without basing it on fairytales so we can stop exporting our females to other jurisdictions so they can get basic treatment.
J C wrote: » I don't believe that a Christian can morally vote for unlimited abortion. The Sixth Commandment is very simple and very clear ... 'Thou shalt not kill'. It means that you cannot kill yourself or another Human Being, except in self defence (or the defence of another Human Being) where no other option is available. This is the basis for all laws protecting the person and criminalising the killing of other people in Common Law Jurisprudence. Induced abortion is ethically and morally wrong ... except where the life of the mother is directly threatened and there is no other option available to save her. This is the current law in Ireland. Voting to expand Irish Law to allow the unlimited killing of unborn children is not something that any Christian (or other monotheist, indeed) can do in conscience and in clear contravention of the Sixth Commandment of God.
fkx2nspcw9omhg wrote: » Yes, of course he will be forgiven.
J C wrote: Owney ... Roman Cathoics don't have a monopoly on opposing abortion ... Moslems also oppose it ... so please stop fighting with your allies ... there are enough pro-abortionists to oppose, without wasting your energies arguing with people who are on your side, on the abortion issue.
Je_suis_Jean wrote: » So you don't deny you misused the statement from the Harvard professor and you've no rebuttal as to why tadpoles are called tadpoles and not "baby frogs" just as fetuses are fetuses and not human beings.
Je_suis_Jean wrote: Why don't you address the question I asked? Can a christian who had educated himself/herself on the issue of abortion and votes in favour of unlimited abortion (for whatever reasons you may not be able to comprehend) but later genuinely respents be forgiven by god or not?
mach1982 wrote: Actual they worship the same God as us the God of Abraham just like the Jews, Jesus is revered as a prophet in Islam(
fkx2nspcw9omhg wrote: » How could an educated voter, ie. one who knows what abortion entails, vote in favour of it?
Je_suis_Jean wrote: So you don't deny you misused the statement from the Harvard professor and you've no rebuttal as to why tadpoles are called tadpoles and not "baby frogs" just as fetuses are fetuses and not human beings.
keano_afc wrote: » Human beings reproduce human beings. That's pretty basic biology. We don't become more human the older we get. You can offer your opinion on when a human life becomes a human being, as far as I'm concerned it's a straw man argument with the sole intention of validating the deliberate killing of the unborn. As I've previously stated, I believe that electively ending a human life is wrong. I have no issue with medical termination when the life of the mother is at risk. I don't know anyone that does. But killing a human being purely because it's an inconvenience is morally repugnant.
Je_suis_Jean wrote: That is what your are saying right? The ignorant voter in favour of abortion commits a lesser sin than the educated voter in favour of abortion but both will receive the mercy of god so long as they truly repent afterwards.
Je_suis_Jean wrote: Cool, so if the key word is repentance as you state it why can't both christians who are ignorant of the abortion issue (as if that was actually possible if they go to mass, read a newspaper, know the 10 commandments, watch the tv etc) and christians who are educated fully on the issue vote in favour of unlimited abortion safe in the knowledge that they can genuinely repent later on and all will be rosie in the kingdom of god forever?
fkx2nspcw9omhg wrote: » Look, those who vote in favour of abortion due to ignorance commit a lesser sin than those who vote for abortion, fully aware of what abortion entails. Nobody is prohibited from the mercy of God. Even the greatest sinner in the world. The key word is repentence.
Je_suis_Jean wrote: Please do show me where Dr Matthews-Roth, Professor of Medicine at Harvard states that a newly conceived foetus is actually a human being rather than a foetus which has the potential to become a human being.