fkx2nspcw9omhg wrote: » What do you mean "prohibited from repenting"? There is no such thing. If you sincerely repent, you are forgiven.
fkx2nspcw9omhg wrote: » When will you ever learn? From the moment of conception to birth abortion is not allowed.
keano_afc wrote: » Yes, silly me trying to project human qualities on to a human being. That kind of thinking will never stick. Look, I completely understand your stance and lack of linguistic honesty. Nobody wants to say they support killing human beings. It's much easier to sell when you are not being truthful.
Je_suis_Jean wrote: » So in your world a fertilized egg a second after the moment of conception is a human being? Fair enough, no point arguing with you on that!!
Katie Full Leak wrote: » So let's get it over with and kill them up to 39 weeks 6 days.
keano_afc wrote: » To quote Dr Matthews-Roth, Professor of Medicine at Harvard: "It is scientifically correct to say that an individual human life begins at conception". Give her a shout there and tell her she's wrong. Let us know how you go.
Je_suis_Jean wrote: Just to clarify, what if a christian spends lot's of time reading all the info available, listens to what his priest says on the subject and really educates himself/herself on the matter and then decides to go ahead and vote in favour of abortion, is that person prohibited from genuinely repenting later on or can any christian who voted in favour of abortion whether they are ignorant of the subject matter or not at the dinner they voted later repent and be forgiven by god?
Je_suis_Jean wrote: » You see that's where the deliberate misuse of valid qualified information just backfires on you. Of course human life starts at conception, just as the life of a 200ft oak tree starts with the germination of an acorn but some fertilized cells post conception are no more a human being than freshly germinated acorn is an oak tree. Please do show me where Dr Matthews-Roth, Professor of Medicine at Harvard states that a newly conceived foetus is actually a human being rather than a foetus which has the potential to become a human being.
Je_suis_Jean wrote: Not currently allowed except where they life of the pregnant woman is at risk. Correct?
Je_suis_Jean wrote: » Of course human life starts at conception, just as the life of a 200ft oak tree starts with the germination of an acorn but some fertilized cells post conception are no more a human being than freshly germinated acorn is an oak tree.
mcfitness20 wrote: no wonder muslims are winning turn the other cheek
Je_suis_Jean wrote: Fair enough, no point arguing with you on that!!
Je_suis_Jean wrote: Please do show me where Dr Matthews-Roth, Professor of Medicine at Harvard states that a newly conceived foetus is actually a human being rather than a foetus which has the potential to become a human being.
fkx2nspcw9omhg wrote: » Look, those who vote in favour of abortion due to ignorance commit a lesser sin than those who vote for abortion, fully aware of what abortion entails. Nobody is prohibited from the mercy of God. Even the greatest sinner in the world. The key word is repentence.
Je_suis_Jean wrote: Cool, so if the key word is repentance as you state it why can't both christians who are ignorant of the abortion issue (as if that was actually possible if they go to mass, read a newspaper, know the 10 commandments, watch the tv etc) and christians who are educated fully on the issue vote in favour of unlimited abortion safe in the knowledge that they can genuinely repent later on and all will be rosie in the kingdom of god forever?
Je_suis_Jean wrote: That is what your are saying right? The ignorant voter in favour of abortion commits a lesser sin than the educated voter in favour of abortion but both will receive the mercy of god so long as they truly repent afterwards.
keano_afc wrote: » Human beings reproduce human beings. That's pretty basic biology. We don't become more human the older we get. You can offer your opinion on when a human life becomes a human being, as far as I'm concerned it's a straw man argument with the sole intention of validating the deliberate killing of the unborn. As I've previously stated, I believe that electively ending a human life is wrong. I have no issue with medical termination when the life of the mother is at risk. I don't know anyone that does. But killing a human being purely because it's an inconvenience is morally repugnant.
Je_suis_Jean wrote: So you don't deny you misused the statement from the Harvard professor and you've no rebuttal as to why tadpoles are called tadpoles and not "baby frogs" just as fetuses are fetuses and not human beings.
fkx2nspcw9omhg wrote: » Unfortunately, Muslims follow a false God, and will receive their just reward.
fkx2nspcw9omhg wrote: » How could an educated voter, ie. one who knows what abortion entails, vote in favour of it?
mach1982 wrote: Actual they worship the same God as us the God of Abraham just like the Jews, Jesus is revered as a prophet in Islam(
Je_suis_Jean wrote: Why don't you address the question I asked? Can a christian who had educated himself/herself on the issue of abortion and votes in favour of unlimited abortion (for whatever reasons you may not be able to comprehend) but later genuinely respents be forgiven by god or not?
Je_suis_Jean wrote: » So you don't deny you misused the statement from the Harvard professor and you've no rebuttal as to why tadpoles are called tadpoles and not "baby frogs" just as fetuses are fetuses and not human beings.
fkx2nspcw9omhg wrote: » God is God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit. There is no other God.
J C wrote: Owney ... Roman Cathoics don't have a monopoly on opposing abortion ... Moslems also oppose it ... so please stop fighting with your allies ... there are enough pro-abortionists to oppose, without wasting your energies arguing with people who are on your side, on the abortion issue.