Je_suis_Jean wrote: OK, I'm calling Mr Baloney here a complete and utter wind up merchant, either that or he's on here in between hours of this:-
fkx2nspcw9omhg wrote: » Again, that's your choice.
Je_suis_Jean wrote: So it's ok to have a choice of options one or more of which may not be "gods choice"?
Je_suis_Jean wrote: Good to know.
fkx2nspcw9omhg wrote: » Of course. God is offering you one choice among others. You decide which choice you make.
Je_suis_Jean wrote: Why can't christians vote for unlimited abortion safe in the knowledge that they can easily repent for making the wrong choice later on and all will be rosie in the kingdom of god forever?
fkx2nspcw9omhg wrote: » I'm afraid that you can't "easily repent" as you say. It must be genuine repentence from the bottom of the heart.
NaFirinne wrote: over 1.6 million unborn babies slaughtered so far this year - that's 15 days -- Can you not see there is something really wrong in the world that kills this many unborn babies?
Gerry T wrote: What about the 9 million people that die of hunger related diseases each yr. Why don't the 2.2billion Christians do something about that, or is it issues where you can preach to people rather than dig into your pockets. I'm not talking about you personally more a comment to the faith believers. Personally I disagree with abortion, wouldn't agree with it in most cases unless the mothers life was at risk. But I wouldn't stop someone having one, forcing my opinion onto them
fkx2nspcw9omhg wrote: » I don't think so.
fkx2nspcw9omhg wrote: » I don't think. So?
fkx2nspcw9omhg wrote: About the nine million people who die of hunger related diseases. What are you doing about it?
SuperSean11 wrote: God only calls the righteous. Oooooo burn......oooo serendipity
SuperSean11 wrote: Fixed your post to increase accuracy.
Gerry T wrote: I do my bit for select charities and in the past I have given time in this area. But your missing the point. Someone preaches saying you'll go to hell for having an abortion, as they sit in their armchair happy that their ok. Well how do they know their not heading to hell for sitting back in their armchair, in their house worth hundreds of thousands, with foreign holidays etc..... While they know millions are starving to death. In my book that would be the bigger sin.
fkx2nspcw9omhg wrote: » Abortion is a heinous offence against Almighty God, and unless repented of, such people shall not enter the Kingdom of God.
Gerry T wrote: » But the commandment didn't give exceptions. Jesus could have defended himself from being killed but he didn't. Your argument may be logical but it's not what the commandment says. If you going to follow the rules YOU can't make exceptions to suit yourself. So if someone tries to kill you, yes you can defend yourself but not to the degree where you yourself will intentionally kill. If you do your breaking that commandment any your no better than any other murderer.
J C wrote: » Obviously, if you use unreasonable force, you will be guilty of illegal killing. Every police force can use intentional lethal force legitimately, if there is an imminent direct threat to life ... and there is no other practical way to safely diffuse the situation.
fkx2nspcw9omhg wrote: » If at the time of voting for abortion, they were in ignorance, and ultimately genuinely repented, of course God will forgive them.
Je_suis_Jean wrote: » Fixed that for ya. Now at least your point is accurately made if nevertheless untrue.
Je_suis_Jean wrote: So if you know voting in favour of abortion is wrong and you go ahead and do it anyway you are then prohibited from ever repenting even if you really genuinely would be repentant?
Lisa Billions Gum wrote: And those who vote for abortion, believing the Yes vote to be the lesser of two evils, and may subsequently regret their decision can gain full absolution though the sacrament of reconciliation if they make a proper and genuine confession.
keano_afc wrote: » Nah you didn't fix it, you just made it more edgy. It always strikes me as odd that pro-abortion advocates only use medical language when talking about an unborn child. Do you call your tongue your glossus too? It's never been explained to me why people use medical jargon to talk about a human life. Oh wait, the whole dehumanise thing. Gotcha.
Je_suis_Jean wrote: I use medical jargon to talk about a medical procedure whereas you use fluffy emotionally incorrect language to try and project human qualities on a foetus.