skipper_G wrote: » **** **** **** boards giving 504 errors for me last few mins. I hope to god nothing stops the thread for showtime
Rfrip wrote: » Just back from the dancing with the stars thread....let’s just all be thankful Conor mcgregors sister Erin isn’t in this
iamwhoiam wrote: » Mouthy like her brother .
Adamocovic wrote: » Hard to tell, like he has come out with some jokes around the main group that probably fall into those categories. Obviously not going to walk up to Ann and say "so which of the birds here you think are the fittest luv?"
MelanieC wrote: » This. It's what I was saying about Andrew too. They alter their behaviour according to the company they're in, same as we all do. I don't think one is the real person and the other fake, just two sides of a multidimensional person. I've long since given up taking notice of the kinda "big man" rubbish lads go on with when they're together! Male bravado, trying to impress and outdo each other. It's rarely ever actually indicative of the person or their reality! I personally would be more interested in how they behave towards others, outside of that machismo dynamic.
Rfrip wrote: » She was so painful wasn’t she!
Mam of 4 wrote: » Nope , I still think Daniel's a d!ck , who just knows how to act and say the right thing when he's around the elders in the house . Banter or no banter , I think he sees himself as someone who can do/say what they want and it's ok , it's banter , nah , don't buy it . Wolf in sheeps clothing .
MelanieC wrote: » You're not for turning, Mam!
Rfrip wrote: » Another good point... God I’m the Ashley of the thread.
neonsofa wrote: » This is true but at the same time it's like that saying about judge a man by how he behaves towards those who can do nothing for him....or something like that, I'm butchering the phrase I think. But the point is, we shouldn't judge someone on how they behave in situations where they have something to prove or gain. But rather on how they behave with their equals, or those who can do nothing for them. With the larger group he faces nominations, with his "lads" he knows they won't nominate him. No need for pleasantries among friends (this thread is a testament to that[b/] :pac:).
Jeff2 wrote: » But...but what of I don't get my post thanked. Woops I'v said too much.
neonsofa wrote: » I always say I'll up my makeup game and I have a lot of products and brushes in my bag but I never know what to do with them
neonsofa wrote: » This is true but at the same time it's like that saying about judge a man by how he behaves towards those who can do nothing for him....or something like that, I'm butchering the phrase I think. But the point is, we shouldn't judge someone on how they behave in situations where they have something to prove or gain. But rather on how they behave with their equals, or those who can do nothing for them. With the larger group he faces nominations, with his "lads" he knows they won't nominate him. No need for pleasantries among friends (this thread is a testament to that :pac:).
littlemouse22 wrote: » Evening all, can't believe it's Sunday again. Where does the weekend go?
Mam of 4 wrote: » Just make sure you don't send anyone a pm , or else you'll be accused of influencing their opinion of others .. Or worse !! Missy.....:D
ibarelycare wrote: » This looks like a boring episode hope I'm wrong!
MelanieC wrote: » Yeah but none of us would talk around our boss or granny the smutty way we do amongst friends on a drunken night out though! Doesn't mean one is real and the other put on, it's just natural adaptation!
kopite386 wrote: » Did Rachel sneeze not wash her hands and then continue making breakfast ?
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wc.vanillicon.com/v2/c32bcee24df1b67a9221d3453f815621.svg)
