One_Of_Shanks wrote: » Not questioning the Mod's comment here but if we cannot discuss speed/lack of it during the works then are we still allowed discuss traffic etc?
I mean they're all related to the works and affecting us commuters during this process, so I was kind of enjoying people's inputs tbh, it was helpful.
Or is this thread purely for comments on the actual progress of the works themselves? Fair enough if so. It might be worth creating a second thread in motoring about general discussion? (if there's one already then someone please post link ifI missed it)
Might as well ask before banging on about the traffic flow today and getting banned
Sam Russell wrote: » No, this forum is about infrastructure, not traffic congestion, speeding, or that kind of thing. Open a thread in the Motoring forum, it is a more appropriate area for that kind of discussion. Yes, that is exactly correct. If traffic discussions were allowed, then that is all that would be discussed, and the Mororing forum would miss out, and we would not like that.You should use the PM function to get this kind of answer.
WhatsGoingOn2 wrote: » Does anyone have a link to the plans for the changes to Junction 10 Naas South?
sdanseo wrote: » http://kildare.ie/CountyCouncil/NationalRoadsOffice/M7NaastoNewbridgeBy-PassUpgradeScheme2013/AnBordPleanalaOralHearing/DayOne/M7%20Traffic%20Analysis%20Brief%20Power%20Point%20Presentation.pdf Pg 13
pad199207 wrote: » That new southbound slip road at New Junction 10 looks desperately short. Should have a left slip too but not near enough room for it so it seems.
regedit wrote: » I drove twice today from J9-J10. Very little work going on the first time at around 12:20 and no work whatsoever at around 15:00. Shame as weekends should be utilised as much as possible. I have a feeling next week will be the same as this one with working area cordoned off for safety reasons. I drove 60 km/h from Naas to Newbridge and every single car overtook me!
Patww79 wrote: » Then they should pay someone who will do it all week, and they would find someone if they wanted. Getting this done as soon as possible should be the priority.
s14driftking wrote: Who do you suggest does this weekend work? I drew materials into it before Xmas Monday to Friday and I know I’ve no intention of working weekends whether it’s quieter or not!!! This is my free time that I feel I’m entitled to have off the same as yourself.
s14driftking wrote: » Who do you suggest does this weekend work? I drew materials into it before Xmas Monday to Friday and I know I’ve no intention of working weekends whether it’s quieter or not!!! This is my free time that I feel I’m entitled to have off the same as yourself.
Kevwoody wrote: » Im sorry but ive bit my tongue now a few times on different threads in the Roads forum. What exactly can we discuss?? Threads have become very quiet lately because discussion is being stifled by one mod in particular. I understand traffic incidents and such are not strictly related to the progress of a build, but they are relevant to the road being discussed.
marno21 wrote: Yes, this is the route of the new R407 Sallins Bypass, the existing bridge is being demolished as part of the works and being replaced by a new bridge to take the Sallins bypass over the M7, which will also be part of the new Junction 9A.
Redsoxfan wrote: » marno21 wrote: Yes, this is the route of the new R407 Sallins Bypass, the existing bridge is being demolished as part of the works and being replaced by a new bridge to take the Sallins bypass over the M7, which will also be part of the new Junction 9A. I see some works going on just outside Sallins on the road to Clane, before the Prosperous Road. Is this where the bypass will start?
pad199207 wrote: » Just being curious here but is there many Rail bridges in Ireland that go over a dual carriageway?
D Trent wrote: » Sorry if asked tonnes of times.,.,, What number will the junction be ?
sdanseo wrote: » M50 J6 M1 J18 Probably a couple in or around Belfast / M1 NI Thought this was going to be an underbridge for the railway, not an overbridge. Seems I was wrong!
Patww79 wrote: » This post has been deleted.
