kg703 wrote: » This is hugely common. While it's unfair to waste someone's time and drinking the prosecco etc. is awful scabby, getting a knock off dress can make sense when they looking for 2-3 grand a dress and the only way to know what one is to try them on.....(I bought off a high street shop so I'm scabby in a different way:pac:.) .
Capt'n Midnight wrote: » From the negative person thread. It's the attitude.
maryishere wrote: » A work colleague was telling me recently of her sister. In December she went in to an Irish shop, picked their brains and looked at different sizes of something, and then bought online from abroad. The shop abroad sent her the wrong size, and she then tried to change it in the Irish shop. Some cheek.
sligojoek wrote: » Beat this. Someone I know told me this about a friend of hers. Her friend Jane went out with a guy named Tim for two weeks. <Not real names> They split up and later Jane found out she was pregnant. Between hoppin and trottin they now have a three year old daughter and they hate each others guts. Last week Tim had the daughter for a day and at some stage she wet herself. Tom bought a 3 pack of underwear in Dunnes for 4euro. When he brought the child home he put the receipt on the table and demanded 2 euro from her for the 2 unused knickers. He thought he was being gracious by paying 2 euro for the one the child was wearing. Here's the good bit. He was stopped by the cops on the way home and the car was lifted for no tax.
rushfan wrote: » My daughter works in a local charity shop, haggling is a regular occurrence. Some of the stories are unreal.
krustydoyle wrote: I was dropping a bag of stuff into a charity shop in carlow town last week and their was a woman arguing with the assistant over an item for €1.. She wanted it for 50 cent
the purple tin wrote: I saw a lady in a charity shop once trying to haggle from 3 euro down to 1 despite the fact there was a sign behind the counter kindly telling customers not to haggle.
whoopsadoodles wrote: » The most negative person I know recently complained that they had lost a tenner on a horse....except they hadn't....the horse had won but they had forgotten to take the odds at time of bet so they would have won an extra tenner if they had. They actually stood there when the horse won saying "ffs, I lost a tenner on that".
sligojoek wrote: » For the third year running I got aftershave from the "Bargain Basket" from the same person. . I've had a beard for the last twenty five years.
enricoh wrote: » There's an aul dear that's a member of the local golf club that comes in to it every day to have a shower, not to golf. Too tight to use her own leccy, the other members call her wash n go!
gordongekko wrote: » How do you know he wears designer underwear?
jcd5971 wrote: » that's what you took from that story? anyway stinge in-coming A lad I work with was without a car for a while and had to walk to and from work. I started earlier but finished same time so brought him home as it was more or less on my way, just took a slightly longer route. this went on for about 6 weeks. He got his car back and that was that. fast forward a few weeks and there is a meeting in dublin we both have to go to, he offers to drive i accept delighted. Half way up he pulls in for fuel, i pop into shop get him a coke and one for myself, jump back into car and he goes "right i topped her up 25 is your share" I looked at him and laughed thinking a joke but no dead serious. I pointed out that I brought him home for weeks for free. he gets in a huff and says fine then we're even now. meeting ends at 4 and lo and behold fcuker leaves without me stranding me in dublin with no way home. Ended up gettin a taxi to bus station and having to wait an age to get bus home. When work found out my manager was shocked and said your man had got mileage for going up and all. he ended up cutting his mileage in half and giving me half (happy days as it was a nice bit)your man didnt speak to me again after that ever unles he absolutely had to.
sullivlo wrote: » He only wears designer underwear.
ligerdub wrote: » Not so much stinge as more a reflection of the callous, "up yours" mentality that the courts and partners have towards fathers who break up with the mothers of their children.