MagicIRL wrote: » I never specified if it mattered or not. I just stated that Diaz took him down. You questioned it, then immediately answered your own question in the same post. It was bizarre. Diaz took Conor down because Conor was tired at the end of the 5th round. We could argue it was because of the weight class? The five rounds? The gameplan? Regardless, it happened. And it happened in the Mayweather fight, too. (Granted, a different sport, but one that requires cardio none the less.) Khabib will tire Conor out long before the 5th round because his style of wrestling/takedown game is different and more intense than Diaz, who will happily box his opponents. Khabib will put you on the mat and keep you there. That's his whole game and he is exceptionally good at it. If Diaz can take him down, Khabib can take him down. It was a simple statement. It has nothing to do with Diaz not getting him down for long, it's the fact that it happened. Enough time + pressure from Diaz led to a takedown. That came too late for Diaz, who lost the round and the fight, but I believe if given the chance to wrestle, Khabib will have him down sooner rather than later. Then Khabib smesh. Mendes took Conor down at will as well. We know Conor had a knee injury which may have played into this, and Conor ultimately won that fight by fantastic KO after surviving on the bottom until a guillotine attempt from Mendes gave him the opportunity to escape, but it was still unnerving to see him wrestled like that. (Side note: The guillotine is JK's fave submission, so it was the perfectly wrong option for Mendes given just how often Conor must've seen it. And to quote Ryan Hall when he was over here teaching; "Well, Mendes went for a guillotine, only his jiujitsu isn't very good" ) Conor's left hand being introduced to Khabib's temple so he goes all Eddie Alvarez on him and gets slept early is how I see the fight going, personally. Khabib gets hit. A lot. And every fighter says that they're in wars in the gym, they've fought tough guys, yada yada yada, and yet, they all crumble after that left hand starts to land. Conor landing the left hand is as sure as Khabib is at taking him down. The question is who'll be first?
MagicIRL wrote: » I never specified if it mattered or not. I just stated that Diaz took him down. You questioned it, then immediately answered your own question in the same post. It was bizarre.
dulux99 wrote: » Hopefully he fights Ferguson in March and they put Khabib vs someone as the co main. Maybe Poirier or somebody. It'd be good to show Khabib can fight twice in a reasonable amount of time
Gamb!t wrote: » Good man Dana.http://www.the42.ie/white-gives-mcgregor-a-deadline-to-defend-ufc-title-3784328-Jan2018/
“As long as Conor is willing to fight by March, we could do Khabib versus Tony and then the winner fights Conor for the title,” the UFC chief said
Mellor wrote: » It will be July in Vegas
scudzilla wrote: » Doesn't that rule Khabib out as Ramadamadingdong would have just finished
iancairns wrote: » The McGregor Goon squad modelling that mank Gym King yesterday. Mort
EdwardC wrote: » 421 days since November 12, 2016. That's a long time.
#FunFact Today Conor McGregor breaks the record for longest period spent without defending a title in UFC history w/ 419 days & counting while not even having had a title defense booked. He officially passes Frank Mir. Mir had to get into a motorcycle accident, break his femur, and tear every ligament in his knee to make that record happen. McGregor sits on the sidelines uninjured and more than capable of defending "his" title.
yourdeadwright wrote: » Khabib is good no question but he was fighting a guy who's main weapon is kick and can't really box, It made it easier for him to close the distance you just have to worry about the one big kick once your past it then your on, When kicking is your only game against a top notch wrestler your in trouble , With McGregor he has to worry about someone who can drop him with punches its a different ball game,
Gintonious wrote: » Saw this the other day, January 5th to be exact.
Mellor wrote: » I'm shocked that they are presumable being paid for that. But more shocking is the fact there 1,000s of people following these lads.
pastorbarrett wrote: » Makes sense. We all know who they are, as well as what Gymking is. Conor by proxy. Look how visible they all were during the Mayweather camp. More than a few would have been curious to see who they were and what exactly they were doing there. In fact, they got the Gymking brand into the ring, for a relative trifle. That's some coup. Can't get Conor, but can get his pals. Clever as far as I'm concerned. I'd also guess there's a degree of inquisitiveness regarding what it's like to be a pal of McGregor. Pays dividends by the looks of it! Stick on a tracksuit, 1000 yard gaze, something-something-hard work success = point to the easy work!
Mellor wrote: » It was more The half assed cheapness. The the GymKing's marketing tactics. I'm sure the McGregor-lite exposure was a steal relatively speaking.