Jawgap wrote: » So under a post about Kingsmill you write that the Provos were freedom fighters? What about the murdering of Gardai and unarmed Irish soldiers? What were those who murdered fellow Irishmen?
Jawgap wrote: » Indeed, especially if it's the type of UI that this patriot, McElduff, advocates.....https://twitter.com/adstack68/status/949680982462025728
FrancieBrady wrote: » What is a 'terrorist'?
noun 1. the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, especially for political purposes.
Fr_Dougal wrote: » .
FrancieBrady wrote: » Princess Consuela Bananahammock wrote: » Question was 'why'? My point is: it's a bit rich to decry people for not being patriotic and then to steamroll over someone else's patriotism simply because they're in a minority. Whose is going to steamroll anybody? It will be a democratic vote based on a hard fought internationally binding agreement which some people haven't seemed to have read before signing up to it.
Princess Consuela Bananahammock wrote: » Question was 'why'? My point is: it's a bit rich to decry people for not being patriotic and then to steamroll over someone else's patriotism simply because they're in a minority.
Princess Consuela Bananahammock wrote: » I'm not saying it won't. I'm not even saying they didn't agree to it. I'm saying, is it still a consistent evaluation of patriotism? And yes, they would be forced to join a united Ireland against their will. Democracy doesn't chance that.
FrancieBrady wrote: » What is the joke about Kingsmill there? Can somebody explain it to me? Kingsmill on my head? Under Kingsmill? I have criticised this guy already for being insensitive but to say he was 'joking' about the massacre seems a bit ott.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » the fact he did it on the anniversary of the murder of innocents by the IRA is just coincidence? and this is somebody that sinn fein think is fit to represent them?
FrancieBrady wrote: » Yeh, it's insensitive in the same way as Bertie making an insensitive comment about suicide. If he was 'joking about the massacre' what was the joke exactly?
FrancieBrady wrote: » So you are ok if nationalists refer to the BA as terrorists? It is a very redundant word in a society that has seen 30/40 years of conflict/war. Especially as it is now becoming clearer that the government and it's forces where players in that conflict/war.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » please dont play the naive fool.
markodaly wrote: » Nationalists welcomed the deployment of the British Army in the north. In fact they lobbied for it.
FrancieBrady wrote: » I am not being naive. He has been accused if making a joke about the massacre, what is the joke? Surely if you are going to take offence you should know what it is you are taking offence at?
ohnonotgmail wrote: » he was mocking the victims. if you cant see that then nobody can help you.
FrancieBrady wrote: » And?
FrancieBrady wrote: » He said he was making a joke about bread (he has a track record for this kind of 'humour'. Not my cup of tea mind) and he should have known that it was the anniversary. How was he 'mocking victims' specifically? Just by being photographed with a loaf of bread? I eat that bread almost every second day.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » I'm glad you put 'humour' in quotes. Sinn Fein representatives not being noted for their wit or intelligence. Asi said if you cant see it then there is nothing that i, or anybody else, can say that will help you. you are too blinded by your political leaning.
markodaly wrote: » So many would not view them as Terrorists.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Again I have to say - and? Many in the nationalist community viewed them as terrorists as do a lot of people around the world who fell foul of them. And they have wreaked a lot of death and suffering around the world, yeh?
markodaly wrote: » Oh here we go again. Maybe save it for this years poppy thread?
FrancieBrady wrote: » You ok there? Sorry for not giving them the due deference there.