Mellor wrote: » That's the nature of fighting in Russia. Does it mean his early record is padded? Yes. Does a padded record mean he isn't legit? No. He can only beat whoever they put in front of him.
DrPhilG wrote: » Haven't been in this thread for a while so haven't gone reading everything. Apologies if this has been covered. Is there no sign of the UFC stripping Conor? Obviously he's the golden goose and has them by the balls but approaching 14 months now for a fit and able fighter not defending his title is absolutely taking the pis$.
Gonad wrote: » Anyone see Tony Mcgregor giving Khabib abuse on Twitter haha
yourdeadwright wrote: » Khabib is good no question but he was fighting a guy who's main weapon is kick and can't really box, It made it easier for him to close the distance you just have to worry about the one big kick once your past it then your on, When kicking is your only game against a top notch wrestler your in trouble , With McGregor he has to worry about someone who can drop him with punches its a different ball game,
Urindanger wrote: » He was rocked by Diaz, albeit whilst tired. Diaz has horrific punch technique and has very little venom in his shots yet he rocked him. Solid but not iron. Mendes's striking troubled Conor more than Johnson or Edson troubled Khabib, take from that what you will... Point being Conor isn't invincible on the feet and can get got.
clsmooth wrote: » yourdeadwright wrote: » I'm not a huge Connor fan but its pretty obvious you can't walk down Connor, Barboza was loading up on kicks its 100 times easier to walk someone down like that than someone who punches like Connor does, Connor doesn't have to set himself like Barboza does and can throw combinations on the move, Plus he has the power to hurt you with hands, you can't just walk him down It'll be a much better fight than the one the other night, i’d disagree with that, Diaz was walking down and landing at will in the first fight. Mayweather walked him down easily, McGregor himself said it after the fight, if he could change anything about the camp it would have been to have train with a sparring partner who walked him down as he struggles with it. It’s the blueprint to beat him IMO
yourdeadwright wrote: » I'm not a huge Connor fan but its pretty obvious you can't walk down Connor, Barboza was loading up on kicks its 100 times easier to walk someone down like that than someone who punches like Connor does, Connor doesn't have to set himself like Barboza does and can throw combinations on the move, Plus he has the power to hurt you with hands, you can't just walk him down It'll be a much better fight than the one the other night,
Ultimate Seduction wrote: » Never KO'd not even dropped. Fairly solid chin if you ask me Mendes striking did not trouble him, not one bit. The wrestling did. Who won that fight by KO in round 2 actually??
clsmooth wrote: » i’d disagree with that, Diaz was walking down and landing at will in the first fight. Mayweather walked him down easily, McGregor himself said it after the fight, if he could change anything about the camp it would have been to have train with a sparring partner who walked him down as he struggles with it. It’s the blueprint to beat him IMO
Urindanger wrote: » Chad Mendes, who's Trex arms personified landed a few times, Khabib can too. And Conor has shown his chin isn't iron either by any means.
Ultimate Seduction wrote: » Khabib with his little t-rex arms can hurt Conor with striking? Now that is nonsense.
sonofenoch wrote: » EagererBeaver wrote: » The fact it's the McGregor thread means you can just accuse people of having an agenda? Interesting view on the purpose of the thread. Ffs, you can't logically draw a line from "Ferguson can't bother him striking" to "McGregor can bother him striking" simply because McGregor is a better striker than Ferguson. There's no equivalence in there. And then to convince yourself that that adds up to an agenda. "Nate broke Conor in two rounds, he wouldn't make it out of the first with Khabib. He'd be walked down, mauled and give his back again" Where's the equivalence there then? the Diaz fight and what Khabib will do? notwithstanding the fact there was a 2nd fight (ignored) why you singling out what I posted unless you share the same agenda....and yes I can accuse have you read this and all the other posts on these treads Ffs
EagererBeaver wrote: » The fact it's the McGregor thread means you can just accuse people of having an agenda? Interesting view on the purpose of the thread. Ffs, you can't logically draw a line from "Ferguson can't bother him striking" to "McGregor can bother him striking" simply because McGregor is a better striker than Ferguson. There's no equivalence in there. And then to convince yourself that that adds up to an agenda.
Urindanger wrote: » I'd agree, but this isn't a boxing match.
Urindanger wrote: » The fact Johnson was able to land pretty easily is far more noteworthy. I feel a lot of people are taking Joe Rogan's words as gospel again with regards to him being hurt. Joe Rogan talks as much nonsense as he does sense. I haven't seen that fight since it happened but I remember Khabib still coming forward and sticking to the gameplan. Very little evidence to say he was hurt. Conor has good power and good shot selection. There is no doubt he has the potential to hurt Khabib, but there's an argument that Khabib can hurt Conor with striking as well.
ASOT wrote: » The man took multiple barboza head kicks clean and still kept coming, johnson "wobbling" him is highly exaggerated.
walshb wrote: » I would pick Conor to beat Khabib... Few ifs.......he's neater, faster and rangier. I think he could time him, slow the pace and strike him out of there....Neatness and clinic-ism win out.
walshb wrote: » It's his first fight that I have heard of against a natural talented big dude.... Yes, he won FW and LW belts.......he was supposed to as far as I am concerned....two "little" men he beat... His best win is against Diaz, and Diaz for me is just not great!
jcd5971 wrote: » Mellor wrote: That's the nature of fighting in Russia. Does it mean his early record is padded? Yes. Does a padded record mean he isn't legit? No. He can only beat whoever they put in front of him. Khabib is a monster on the ground. But he is ponderous on the feet. I could easily see McGregor being taken down and grinder into oblivion for 5 or submitted. I could also see Khabib getting slept handily on the feet. Kinda why I'd like to see the damn fight happen.
Mellor wrote: That's the nature of fighting in Russia. Does it mean his early record is padded? Yes. Does a padded record mean he isn't legit? No. He can only beat whoever they put in front of him.