Doltanian wrote: » GAA Dublin-centric and the huge unexposed corruption within the GAA is the problems, particularly Referees destroying the game taking bribes are the biggest problem.
Noddy Nangle wrote: » My honest view is that it should be voluntary for everyone and that clubs receive more from Croke Park to develop
kala85 wrote: » Please elaborate on this. What referees are taking bribes.
Green Peter wrote: » I walked away many years ago for the same reason. However I've encountered many of the same problems in other sports and organisations I've been involved in with some exceptions. I think it's an Irish thing and sadly I don't see it changing and definitely not in the GAA. The ticket distribution for example for all Ireland's is as rotten a system as you can get and yet no one can change it. It's amazing how revenue can turn a blind eye to gaa managers payments and hound ordinary folk for minor issues.
kala85 wrote: What problems do you have with the distribution of tickets
terryduff12 wrote: » Played a lot in my youth till about 16 got bit fed of it, have a young lad 6 now will I get him into it I don't know. Never had much interest watching it, would rather play it but from what I do watch black card crap and ruby tackling people to stop them from scoring its a joke. And its on sky sports much like what the FAI done years back but didn't get away with it. How long before its only on sky sports 5-10 years.
Green Peter wrote: » Are you for real?
Noddy Nangle wrote: » To answer a couple of points raised. Someone said that fundraising jobs, county board delegate should be delegated our. The problem is in small clubs there is no one there only three or four people so there is no one to delegate too. Also in my opinion insurances/ competition fees should be zero. Any moneys raised in clubs should stay in clubs. The issue of paying managers should cease immediately. It’s destroying clubs. The same transfer rules should apply to managers as players. This would stop the soccer style payments that managers receive and they can manage whoever they want wherever they want with no punishment.
rpurfield wrote: » Noddy in all the club three or four people do all the work? What size is the club, surely there's parents of underage players you could hook in even on a specific thing such as organizing a fundraiser or whatever. It can't be healthy for the club or the three or four people to be carrying that workload.
MentalMario wrote: » Great post. A lot of people involved in committees can relate to it I'd say. I've been involved in most executive positions previously and it's thankless. Not that you do it for a pat on the back, but it's just not worth the hassle at times. Lads arguing to hear their own voice in committee meetings which means they drag on a lot longer than they should is a big pain point for me. Arguing over trivial things for nothing. There's usually no takeaway or decision made at the end of it. Infuriating. When I stepped away from the committee side of things, I couldn't enjoy going to games as every time I did, I got a job. You'd be trying to avoid 4 or 5 people because you'd know if you see them, they'll ask you to do something. It'd make you resent the club. I feel sorry for our secretary. He's given over a decade of his time and nobody will take over from him meaning he'll have to keep doing it.