J. Marston wrote: » Steph's dress was half a step up from a bin liner.
SureYWouldntYa wrote: » What about Joey Ryan?
Omackeral wrote: » Don't mention the war!!!!!!!!!!
leggo wrote: » Right your argument is all over the place now: if Cena/Rock was that great, why not use that as an example instead of 'My Way'. Why bring up WWE from 2000/01 at all if modern wrestling achieves the same end that you're going for? Or do you know that that weakens your argument so you point elsewhere because the truth of it all doesn't matter and you're just arguing with any point I make now? Then you're using Omega/Jericho as an example of a great angle. I know you don't know a lot about wrestling outside of WWE (I can be passive-aggressive too) but you also know that Omega and the Young Bucks form The Elite? And that Omega does all of this stuff with them? So on one hand you're going, "The Young Bucks are ruining wrestling!" Then saying "Look at this for a classic wrestling angle!" I hate to disappoint you...but the Young Bucks are probably going to be at ringside for that match. They've been a part of this great wrestling angle all along. Your bar for 'niche' is non-existent. You just continually move it to mean 'not WWE'. You're a WWE mark, which you're allowed to be, but your Vince blinkers are totally skewing anyone being able to take you seriously. It doesn't matter if a show sells 30,000, if it's not sold out it's 'niche'. WrestleMania 7 (in fact many of the earlier WrestleManias), headlined by Hulk Hogan, didn't sell that many tickets, was that a niche event? Like define what niche is specifically, set parameters or stop using it. At this stage when you say it I just translate it in my brain as you saying, "Stuff I don't understand and that scares me!" Also your example of WWE in 2000/01 as a model for wrestling being taken seriously is hilarious, considering you cite the likes of Cornette, Dutch Mantell and Rip Rodgers as sources. Do you even know that that's not their era and they actively HATED the product around then? Like then more than now was the period where old-timers spoke out about how wrestling had gone to the dogs. Sammartino and Billy Graham disowned it entirely. Lastly, you don't understand meta and that's fine. But that's how audiences suspend their disbelief these days. In a world post-'pipe bomb' promo, you even had Triple H come out and call it the 'Reality Era' on Raw, meaning that the fourth wall would be broken regularly. None of this is niche btw. And the idea of breaking the fourth wall, artistically, is to acknowledge what fans know to be an act and therefore can't get into, then to work them again with that in mind. That's how you suspend disbelief in 2017. The toothpaste is out of the tube on wrestling being fake unfortunately, and people like Omega, Young Bucks etc are actively working to bring you back in by not insulting your intelligence. I find it way more intelligence-insulting, personally, getting punched repeatedly in the face, not bleeding and telling me this is 'real' than by treating it as an athletic performance used to tell stories and entertain (which is what wrestling actually is). The way they're doing it, it is real, because they're open and candid about it. You can't get your head around that and, again, that's fine.
Kankan14 wrote: » Can we please,please,please have a one-off exhibition match of around the horn with MNG versus Leggo?
leggo wrote: » I'll just give you a moment to redo your post which is 99% you telling me what I like. Please don't do that, it's weird.
leggo wrote: » Then you're using Omega/Jericho as an example of a great angle. I know you don't know a lot about wrestling outside of WWE (I can be passive-aggressive too) but you also know that Omega and the Young Bucks form The Elite? And that Omega does all of this stuff with them? So on one hand you're going, "The Young Bucks are ruining wrestling!" Then saying "Look at this for a classic wrestling angle!" I hate to disappoint you...but the Young Bucks are probably going to be at ringside for that match. They've been a part of this great wrestling angle all along. Your bar for 'niche' is non-existent. You just continually move it to mean 'not WWE'. You're a WWE mark, which you're allowed to be, but your Vince blinkers are totally skewing anyone being able to take you seriously. It doesn't matter if a show sells 30,000, if it's not sold out it's 'niche'. WrestleMania 7 (in fact many of the earlier WrestleManias), headlined by Hulk Hogan, didn't sell that many tickets, was that a niche event? Like define what niche is specifically, set parameters or stop using it. At this stage when you say it I just translate it in my brain as you saying, "Stuff I don't understand and that scares me!"
Bounty Hunter wrote: » Nobody asked a poster to meet for a fight outside Easons
CastorTroy wrote: » Is that a thing that happens?
Omackeral wrote: » I'll fight someone outside Eason if they do a traveller call out video. Ya junkies junkies b*astard ya.
gerrybbadd wrote: » You're the King ah nothin
ShagNastii wrote: » Easons?!!! What a bunch of marks!!!
Conors debutGer's responseConors retortGers final blow
gerrybbadd wrote: » Why don't ya meet me outside Easons and find out (jk)
Bounty Hunter wrote: » Many moons ago a boards.ie/PW poster by the name of Ger.C was running down and Irish wrestler when said wrestler, Conor Hurley (Below), started posting on boards in response and asked Ger to meet him halfway between where they were outside an Easons to settle things. Taken from the hotlinks thread:
leggo wrote: » That's epic, I had completely forgotten about that. I knew Conor, he was a nice guy who got harsh treatment. I wouldn't have known him at that time but anytime I worked with him he was full of questions and fully aware of his inexperience and weaknesses (if anything too harsh on himself because everyone sucks when they're new to anything). It's tough because you don't really get prepped for the feedback that can come with it (well maybe they do today but not back then) and it can really suck once you're reading stuff that hits a nerve but is also really unfair too. The line between fair criticism and harassment also gets dangerously blurred quite quickly. To be fair, it works both ways and everyone who has wrestled long enough (and I don't even mean 10-15 years, a couple of years in will do) has their share of stories about intense fans, both liking and disliking you. Another story for another day but I once had my Bebo hacked :pac:. But ultimately the wrestlers are the ones putting themselves out there and getting paid so it falls to them to have to take it on the chin, unless it gets to ridiculous levels.