Banjo wrote: » Only thing with that is you lose that sense of frantic panic when all your hard work is about to get digested by a jelly or accidentally murdered by a travelling companion who wouldn't just drop you a rope. I mean the loss of Betty means something. The loss of a handful of redshirt trap fodder / body donors... Meh! You need the jeopardy!
sKeith wrote: » yeah, betty was a valued member of the team, quite deserving of an equal share!
Banjo wrote: » She got her fair share of what we were handed in that tomb. Your share too! :'(
sKeith wrote: » goody, in your character sheet you put 1586 gp, but 1425 of that is in two items of treasure still, and not gp. dont you need to sell those items to realize gp? it shouldn't just magic into gp and have 0 encumbrance. as i say, ive never played this before, so am not sure of how it works, and i did ask the q's but got no responce yet.
Fourier wrote: » Sorry for this, do you have a link to the questions I missed. I did a search with terms like "GP" and can't see them. Cheers!
Tigger wrote: » goodie is the charachter there is a reasonnit says +1425 rather tan staright 1686 or whatever its so i know that some is jewls and some is gp btw your charachter is lawful iirc and therfore if playing to type would have saved bandy mine is neutral and gets to make the choice from p14 or the rules EXAMPLE: If an adventurer were in a situation where his companions were trapped and would meet certain death without his help, he would act in the following ways based on his alignment: The lawful character would sacrifice himself if necessary to rescue his companions. He would never leave them behind unless he had a better chance of saving them by doing so, or some truly greater cause could be achieved
sKeith wrote: » again, in the ooc @ rolz Necrominus: OMG... Eckie... Necrominus: :O sKeith: lmao Fourier: Necro, give me a Dex sKeith: i'm lawful, i can't choose between you two. Fourier: I didn't save them your honour, I'm too moral
Banjo wrote: » Guys, about the village - who are you buying stuff off? The shopkeeper is dead in that sludge and her dad is unlikely to hand over armour without asking why you're naked, where his daughter is and what's the big hurry? Re : alignments - there are more than 3 types of people, I think we need leaway within the 3 buckets given.
Tigger wrote: » its not in charachter , you are a power gamer and thats cool but the pointbof role playing is to play within the parameters lookingbfor loopholes and alowing a pc to die because of a npc is out of charachter indontbcare but if you are goong to knit pock
sKeith wrote: » the store me and saeros went to. not bettys shop its beside the tempe
sKeith wrote: » if the dm thinks im out of character, he'll punish me for it. Note that although players should do their best to adhere to one of these spheres, the Labyrinth Lord will take note when behavior deviates too much from their chosen alignment and he may assign a new alignment more appropriate to actual character actions.
Tigger wrote: » same applies to my methods of recording stuff
sKeith wrote: » wow, i just read urban dictonary for power gamer. ouch
Digital Solitude wrote: » Alignments are a load of bollocks and hold back role-playing imo. sK is playing Ekbard and is the only one who can say how he acts, maybe he's generally lawful but fear for his life and an innate greed could have taken over to escape, maybe he didn't like Bandy or thought he was a lost cause. Could be hundreds of potential reasons for Ekbard to act the way he did. Not having a go Tigs just my two cents, one out of alignment action doesn't mean a thing, given how many different factors could be taken into account for every single action. Especially when this big fookin mouth is chewing the legs off your mate, I know both Moy and Digi would have been fighting Bandy for first step on the ladder as opposed to pulling him out.
sKeith wrote: » in the ooc i explained, ekbard could not make the choice between bandy and betty, if he had chosen bandy, he felt bandy would have hated himfor choosing bandy over his love betty and vice versa. once he reached the outside he immeditaly used the moon necklaces to slow the creature and give both characters a chance.
sKeith wrote: » it was in rolz sKeith: i'm naked, so need to get to village soon to re-armour. how do you get rid of treasure?
sKeith wrote: » how many of us are there, not counting betty and othegre?