Ficheall wrote: » Is it okay to kick a midget if they kick you first?
Omackeral wrote: » I don't think I agree with that. Same goes for if some piece of sh*t hit my gf for example, I'd absolutely smack him. Wouldn't even think about it. You wouldn't think that's justified?
Tell me how wrote: » I'm not trying to be annoyingly argumentative but if they're following you around, you're moving. If you're moving, can you not leave the area?
Tell me how wrote: » Would you think it would be wrong for a guy to lock himself in a room to prevent a female hitting him or do you think he should hit her to get her to stop?
Omackeral wrote: What if you're on a bus, say the Nightlink. Full of drunks, full of arguments. Can't always remove yourself.
Omackeral wrote: You could make a case for either to be honest.
Tell me how wrote: » Yes, you can. It's an inconvenience maybe, but you can. But isn't that the question you've asked here? So, you're in your apartment, your gf is aggressive and slapping you. Do you A: lock yourself in ensuite until she's calmed down, B: leave the apartment or C: hit her?
Tell me how wrote: » Yes, you can. It's an inconvenience maybe, but you can.
Tell me how wrote: » So, you're in your apartment, your gf is aggressive and slapping you. Do you A: lock yourself in ensuite until she's calmed down, B: leave the apartment or C: hit her?
So, you're in your apartment, your gf is aggressive and slapping you. Do you A: lock yourself in ensuite until she's calmed down, B: leave the apartment or C: hit her?
SuperSean11 wrote: Oh I saw this one on pornhub, ye call the Gardai, 2 bean guards come and have sex with you while the gf pouts.
SuperSean11 wrote: » Oh I saw this one on pornhub, ye call the Gardai, 2 bean guards come and have sex with you while the gf pouts.
Tell me how wrote: » Gardai on PH? Calls for some research.
Deleted User wrote: Change the gender roles. It's not even about physical disparity at this stage you're throwing out an absolute nonsensical proposition that one person should not only bear all responsibility for being the target of another's aggression but that they should imprison themselves rather than take steps to defend themselves or retaliate?
Are Am Eye wrote: » In the right time and the right place you can hit her with some Barry White.
Tell me how wrote: » So I take it you would hit someone rather than try to avoid them hitting you? I'm not suggesting you're right or wrong, I'm suggesting that you'd have chosen to do so and couldn't say you had no alternative option.
Deleted User wrote: I'd imagine I'd avoid or control if I could. Defend if I couldn't. Whether I'd retaliate or attempt to do so I don't honestly now but I think "should" is an easy word to type. I can't imagine that anyone would argue that locking yourself in the jacks after being subjected to assault is a healthy reaction.
Tell me how wrote: » So you say you'd try to avoid but thinking doing so by putting a locked door between you and the attacker would be unhealthy. Why?
Omackeral wrote: Option Leave her. Wouldn't be with an abusive partner.
Omackeral wrote: But hypothetically if it did happen. I wouldn't hit someone I love and care about unless they had a knife or something. It's a completely different scenario when talking about some random drunk scumbag assaulting you.
SuperSean11 wrote: They could burn the house down with you inside.
Tell me how wrote: » That's the "they deserved it" defence. It's not a recommended one in a court of law though is it?
Deleted User wrote: Assault is a traumatic event. I think adding to it by taking an extremely passive role such as described would make it all the more so.
LadyMacBeth_ wrote: » I don't think it's really acceptable for people to be going around throwing slaps in general. I have to be honest and say that if a woman slapped a man once and he slapped her back I wouldn't think much of her but I'd think less of him. I'm actually trying to explain why to myself right now though. Maybe because of the general difference in size and strength of men and women. In your case OP she slapped you a few times so I think that's a different scenario, I'd understand you slapping her back. I don't know. Maybe don't slap people and if they slap you then try to restrain them rather than slap them back? If a man slapped a woman and she slapped him back I'd think it was deserved but somehow I think that men should restrain the woman if she slaps first. I know that is a sexist response and I'll have to think about that. It's just my gut feeling on it.
SuperSean11 wrote: Them pulling a knife on you would be a pretty strong mitigating defense
Riddle101 wrote: In self defense yes. Although it depends on the circumstances. If a woman is being really abusive and assaulting me then I feel I have the right to defend myself and use appropriate force to stop her. However I probably wouldn't hit a woman if a got a single slap from her. If she just slapped me and that was it then I would probably just leave it. It just really depends on the circumstances, like why is the woman hitting me? is there a good enough reason? Somethings aren't always black or white. Other than self defense I can't really think of why a man would want to hit a woman unless he's an abusive a*shole. In which case it wouldn't be acceptable.
Tell me how wrote: » Absolutely it would, but when in this hypothetical debate did that happen? The OP asked about reacting to a woman throwing a slap by retaliating in kind.
Omackeral wrote: » You're on a subway then. Or a train. You can't always just leave. Besides, they can keep up the assault on you if you attempt to leave. Option Leave her. Wouldn't be with an abusive partner. But hypothetically if it did happen. I wouldn't hit someone I love and care about unless they had a knife or something. It's a completely different scenario when talking about some random drunk scumbag assaulting you.
Omackeral wrote: Option Leave her. Wouldn't be with an abusive partner. But hypothetically if it did happen. I wouldn't hit someone I love and care about unless they had a knife or something. It's a completely different scenario when talking about some random drunk scumbag assaulting you.
SuperSean11 wrote: See above
Tell me how wrote: » Hmmm. I still understood the OP (who also posted above) was talking about the situation which did not include a knife. A knife is a different discussion, obviously.
Omackeral wrote: » But hypothetically if it did happen. I wouldn't hit someone I love and care about unless they had a knife or something. It's a completely different scenario when talking about some random drunk scumbag assaulting you.