KevinOD88 wrote: » Last example, people pay 15 quids an hour to pet cats in a "cat cafe" in Smithfield...
Alaia Incalculable Butcher wrote: » Buying in Dublin is nkt on tbeir radar as it's simply unobtainable. Neighbouring counties with reasonable public transport is the dream.
Stheno wrote: » If they are single and hoping to buy in Dublin I think I read recently they would need to be earning 70k to afford to qualify for a mortgage to buy in Dublin
DivingDuck wrote: » Of the three people I was talking about, one is early 20s, living with a flatmate, working in a warehouse. One is mid 30s, unemployed, and living at home. One is early 30s, only recently joined the workforce due to remaining in academia for a long time, and living with a flatmate. None of these people have flash jobs, but they're putting forth zero consideration for their future requirements. It sounds like your friends are being mindful of their futures instead. Different people, different values. We are all entitled to make our choices. But like in Shenshen and Candie's stories, some are able to make ends meet on the same budgets as others who find themselves struggling. We've all experienced that. Does it depend on what people consider "essential", or do you think your friends are just on very low wages?
Alaia Incalculable Butcher wrote: » They are single and I think they're realistic. What's currently affordable is not suitable for medium to long term so it would seem foolish to go down the "getting your foot on the ladder and trade up later" route if sharing a kippy house in a dodgy area with strangers and risk being turfed out at the drop of a hat so a landlord can "use it for family" is preferable to what's on offer.
KevinOD88 wrote: » And yet in Dublin from Thursday evening onwards, the city center is jammed with these 25's / 30's in restaurants, bars, shops, cafes. Perhaps they have no disposable income left once they have blown it all away. I remember that during the lower point of the crash, plenty of shops closed down, in the last 3 years I have seen plenty of new businesses opening. Surely they need people with income to dispose of. Last example, people pay 15 quids an hour to pet cats in a "cat cafe" in Smithfield...
Stheno wrote: » Are they single or couples? And are they being realistic in their expectations as to what they can afford?
Alaia Incalculable Butcher wrote: » These are professionals in their mid to late 30s. I honestly don't know anyone living as you describe. I'm not saying there aren't people out there who aren't spendthrifts with a budgeting problem but equally there are a lot of people living extremely frugally to try secure accommodation for their future.
DivingDuck wrote: I'm not saying there aren't people out there who are genuinely badly off. There are, and always have been, and always will be. But equally, there are a lot of people who could live differently and structure their spending differently, but choose not to.
DivingDuck wrote: » Is that average nationwide, or for Dublin specifically?
hurler32 wrote: » ...it seems younger people starting out in Work have little to no disposable income.
mdmix wrote: » electronic goods are assembled for pittance in aisia. the parts used are made by skilled workers on decent wages in europe. no-one will spend more if they have the option of spending less for similar quality, so taking personal responsibility isn't going to change anything. this is something government to legislate for.
Stheno wrote: » The average industrial wage is approx. 37k so a couple on that would qualify for a mortgage of 260 with a deposit of 26k if they were first time buyers That's a total of 286k there are properties in Dublin for that particularly apartments
deathtocaptcha wrote: » Most people earn under €30k/year yet the average 3 bed semi in Dublin is €400k... they'll get a mortgage for €105k assuming they have a €40k deposit. Buying a cheaper car, quitting coffee, making your own lunch etc... is all well and good but let's face it, it isn't going to result in you saving €255k needed to buy your own home...
Candie wrote: » There is a lot of poor impulse control behind some peoples self imposed poverty. I knew someone who had the same job I had, he was full time and it was his proper job, I was part time and it was a student job. He spent every penny as soon as his pay came in, on stupid impulse buys that the novelty wore off almost immediately, take-out and eating out ever meal, nights out where he'd subsidise his unemployed friends. He never had a penny and most bizarrely, since it was staring him in the face, he couldn't figure out why. As far as he was concerned everyone lived like he did. He lived at home and didn't drive, so he was never going to starve or be homeless, he just hadn't a clue how to keep track of his spending. On part time hours I paid all my bills, ran a car, and was able to save towards fees and expenses, but I was aware of where every single penny went. I didn't starve or freeze either, I had a pretty nice lifestyle compared to most because I spent it where it mattered.
Alaia Incalculable Butcher wrote: » No this is not the case with people I know. Every penny is saved in the desperate hope of ever having their own home. People are literally sitting at home with nothing but Netflix for years. No nights out, no holidays, no shopping. Even days out have to be carefully considered with a trip out to Dun Laoghaire costing over €8 on a Leap card. This is normal life in my circle.
Shenshen wrote: » That is exactly what I'm talking about. We get more and more consumer goods for less and less money. Someone pointed out earlier that in the 60s, people on average spent around 20% of their income on food. Today, that's come down to less than 6% (figures are from the US, but the trend is the same throughout the Western world). And one of the reasons we're spending less is because labour costs are being squeezed dramatically. The electronic goods are being produced for a pitance in Asia, the fruit and veg are harvested by migrant workers, you name it. I think it's worth considering that it's our very own spending habits that contribute significantly to the much-quoted wage-squeeze and race to the bottom.
mdmix wrote: » i get what your saying. they should save that money instead, and in just 10 short years they could have enough for half the deposit for a mortgage! wouldn't be enough for one of those "affordable houses" that Leo was telling us about, maybe something in Leitrim though.
McGaggs wrote: » Ah come on now, people using travel agents? Pull the other one.
DivingDuck wrote: » The three "most broke" people I know are constantly buying crap. Online, offline, everywhere. Clothes, convenience food, nights out, convenience travel, beauty products, runners, novelty t-shirts, tech accessories— different things each. One person's living with family, the other two with a roommate. None of it is expensive— every item would be sub €50, a lot of it under €20. But just €50 a week on rubbish is €2,600 a year. They constantly complain about how they have "no money" and they are "so poor" but all of these purchases are 1) not essential, and 2) poorly budgeted/planned. They don't seek deals, they don't consider alternatives, they just buy everything they see that they want if the money is available to them in that moment. Are these folks entitled to do that? Absolutely, it's their cash— but the problem isn't lack of money, it's lack of impulse control. Maybe there is less disposable income these days, but there has also been a huge shift away from saving/responsible purchasing and towards regularly impulse buying cheap rubbish for a quick serotonin hit.
Dohnjoe wrote: » You have better rights, equality, infrastructure, healthcare, education, job choice/options/mobility, better quality goods/services, transport, safety than previous generations
hurler32 wrote: » seeing as young people are only paid enough to exist, scavanging in Aldi-Lidl etc to make ends meet ?? The rich business owners- Bosses- Shareholders aren't contend to be Millionaires anymore they want to be Billionaires , hence those at the Bottom are a growing body of people just about existing??
server down wrote: » The other argument that bugs me is the 50” telly. I had a CRT until a month ago but I bought a 49” TV with a 6 year guarantee for 460. That’s 6€ a month if I get rid after the guarantee runs out. There’s a kernel of truth there, with everybody looking for a deal and buying on amazon etc there’s less money flowing around.
Rubberchikken wrote: » City rental and purchase prices are crazy. I realise there are cheaper accommodation options outside these areas but probably inconvenient to most. It's not 'scavenging' to shop in Aldi or Lidl.i don't buy much in them but what I get is fine. Lots of people do a weekly shop there and don't look bad for it. There's always been rich. No shame in it. If people want disposable income maybe they need to spend less on their type of car. Insisting on a new one on credit isn't clever. Still wasting money on guy rot coffee from garages isn't clever. I could go on but I've work to get to. Allows me my disposable income.
DivingDuck wrote: » The three "most broke" people I know are constantly buying crap. Online, offline, everywhere. Clothes, convenience food, nights out, convenience travel, beauty products, runners, novelty t-shirts, tech accessories— different things each. One person's living with family, the other two with a roommate. None of it is expensive— every item would be sub €50, a lot of it under €20. But just €50 a week on rubbish is €2,600 a year.
Alaia Incalculable Butcher wrote: » I don't recognise this picture of people hemorrhaging money on lunches, coffee, the latest iphone and nights out at all. Everyone around me is living at home or housesharing in their 30s, afraid to turn on the heat, eating last night's dinner for lunch and nights out are a rarity. I might know one person who gets away for a week in any given year, cars are few and far between and ten years old. The sharp decline in disposable income is blatantly obvious the past 5-7 years.