zimmermania wrote: » You refer to those who may disagree with you as idiots! Whether you like it or not everyone is entitled to air their views and I certainly will continue to do so. The only abuse handed out here is coming from yourself and the rest of the mutual admiration society who resent the act that some of us pay no attention to the nonsense emanating from an incestuous little clique who think these pages are just for yourself and a few delusional fellow travellers.
zimmermania wrote: » I will post wherever I wish and if yourself and the mindless muppets who hardly ever tip a winner and sneer at other posters who are not afraid to suggest ceretain horses have a chance of winning.I will not be bullied or intimidated by you or any of your cronies.
Trond wrote: » Long time lurker, always read this thread and the stallions one. Different kind of knowledge imparted than the general betting/after timing ones. Thumbs up from me..........
Chancer3001 wrote: » Try keep things on track lads. Back to horses please.
Gregk961 wrote: » Thats the difference between the two forums I suppose. I think most people here have an actual interest in the sport itself mixed in with some betting. The gambling forum is mostly fairly generic "2.50 wolverhampton unlucky last time etc etc" type posts. Mixed in with some blatant aftertiming/boasting. Most people posting over there dont seem to appreciate the difference between picking a few winners and making an actual profit.
zimmermania wrote: » Jaysus,do you actually believe that you lot are some kind of elite? and those of us who bet regularly are just people who know little or nothing about pedigrees an breeding? Well I can tell you that I have a great interest in breeding racehorses and have an interest in a well bred yearling,i have been in many racing yards and hope to visit many more. You have an outdated view of the racing world,it is no longer the landed gentry who exclusively control racing. The last couple of lines of your patronising post suggests that the clique who are critical of me and look down their noses at those who post on the fancies thread are in some way inferior to them and yourself . Your last line,where you claim that "Most people over there don't seem to appreciate the difference between picking a few winners and actually making a profit" is pure fantasy and actually implies that profits are being made by those on the "other thread" I do not see much evidence of the profits being made and it is probably a figment of your class ridden and fertile imagination.
Gregk961 wrote: » No im saying thats the difference between the two forums. Ive never seen one post on the gambling forum about something other than betting. Just link me to a recent thread with nothing to do with gambling to prove me wrong. People have different interests, thats why there are two separate forums. You seem to spend a lot of time worrying about what other people "imply" and "suggest".
zimmermania wrote: » I think you may find a clue in the titles of the threads you refer to. One is titled "fancies for today" and the other is the tips thread,could'nt be easier,I collect antiques and I keep any thought on antiques in the appropriate thread and say nothing about Georgian furniture or pre Raphaelite art on the fancies page.
Gregk961 wrote: » Yes exactly what I was saying. Most people on the gambling forum are interested in fancies and "tips", those are the only two active threads.
Jayden Powerful Accident wrote: » Ah now, there's golf, lotto (the advice is don't buy yourselves any golden xmas raffle tickets this year, it's 1.011%c chance from a 35% fundbase. Separately another chap got his triple sequential 1500/1 balls last week). Occasional novelties (tv/specials) and of course politics (the many, many Trump 25/1 pages from '16 are a great entertaining read through). Then there's the aftertiming, doing what it does. That recent 49,000/1 near six-fold is a pretty sight, but just failed to materialise (was too greedy), next time just five-fold.
zimmermania wrote: » If you knew me you would know how wrong you are,i never worry as I have very little to worry about.
BumperD wrote: » Not surprised but still disgustinghttps://www.racingpost.com/news/news/read-the-transcript-of-david-evans-conversation-with-a-ladbrokes-trader/310352
Francie Barrett wrote: » That clown Luke Harvey will be laughing. His horse is a winner at 66/1 just there at the first at Towcester.
mailburner wrote: » surely thistlecrack at 11/10 is a steal tomorrow esp getting 6lbs from his only serious rival harry?
naughto wrote: » https://www.pigsback.com/en-ie/offer/402488/leopardstown-racecourse
Shemale wrote: » **** me 33 to watch Stephens Day racing, you would want to be soft in the head
TheTorment wrote: » Jamie Codd takes the ride in the bumper for Olly Murphy in Doncaster tomorrow. Being smashed in the betting.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w1.vanillicon.com/v2/1c39260e22c1cba4d360c781f895c4c4.svg)
