ezra_ wrote: » We are in a de facto run up to an election. Orders from on-high will be to not rock the boat.
Cass wrote: » With no due respect at all, she couldn't know less. How a Minister thought she could give a "nod" to a private body to run a mandatory course with no tender, no data protection, no license, no regulation, no background check, no planning, no foresight, and most importantly no change to legislation is beyond belief. In case anyone is still of the mind that she could ask yourself why she immediately pushed the date back. She knew she messed up and had to do some serious back peddling and the fact the deer crowd were so pissed means they got no heads up. I hope Minister Madigan has previous knowledge or experience as it may actually help us. She'll see the need for better implementation of such courses and changes. I, with bated breath, welcome her to the position. Only time will tell how it goes.
Grizzly 45 wrote: » Just in lunchtime news Mr Varadkar promoted high profile backbench TD Josepha Madigan, of Dublin Rathdown, to take over from Ms Humphreys at the Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht. Well, sorry folks it definitely looks like back to the drawing board for anymore and one chancing their arms with fiendish plots.:p
Hunter456 wrote: » funny thing is some lads have being hunting deer way before these idoits got their grubby hands on to these organisations and they still expected them to sit a course makes me laugh anyway. they got their answer so they will move on to the next plan to screw the ordinary shoot in the ass
Cass wrote: » Here, and not to sound like a snowflake, but i got tongue lashed and raked over the coals for even asking why such a place is being set up (and it was a genuine curiosity at the time, given the proposals from the so called coalition).
cavan shooter wrote: » Somewhere in the world of boards did we not discuss at length under I think the Sports Coalition of vested interests thread this same training academy?? I must say even inspector clusoe could draw some parallels and conclusions here.
gunny123 wrote: » From solocheck.ie : rish Firearms & Hunter Training Academy Limited was set up on Wednesday the 6th of May 2015. Their current address is Co. Dublin, and the company status is Normal. The company's current directors Albertus Hanekom Valentyn and Declan Keogh have been the director of 1 other Irish company between them.
Walter Mittys Brother wrote: » There's already a setup here based out of Courtlough https://ifhta.ie/ offering some of that stuff. Country Sports Ireland, isn't Midlands range tied in with them. Seen an announcement that JP got an appointment with them.
Resistance is futile wrote: » https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1937378139915534&id=1937363159917032 The race to be the king of the hill has just started . A group across the border are leading the race see link above
solarwinds wrote: » Quote:including the different deer organisations such as the Irish Deer Society and the Wild Deer Association of Ireland, which have done far more for deer and for deer hunters than any other shooting organisation over the last forty years. Absolutely nothing for me or the deer i shoot.
Cass wrote: » So were the NARGC present at these meetings, who was there as a rep for the NARGC and what involvement did they have? If they were involved in any amount they have the same questions to answer such as why not inform your membership. I'm getting a little tired of these groups making submissions and acting on the agenda of the few people at the meeting which usually is in stark contrast the best interests of the sport. If the NARGC had a hand in it, time to come clean as it'll come out at some point. A simple FOI request for the minutes of all meetings will identify the people and groups involved.
or equivalent" is part of the Coilte handbook and has no basis in law so meaningless to non Coilte shooters.
Grizzly 45 wrote: » This recommendation was duly submitted to the Ministers concerned and confirmation of adoption of the recommendation was subsequently received by the Forum.
It is at best disingenuous to suggest that the NARCG were not party to consultations, which were exhaustive.
In fact, as can be seen from the Recommendation, certification is not limited to Deer Alliance HCAP.
So far as Deer Alliance HCAP is concerned, “HCAP or equivalent” has always been and continues to be, the criterion for certification.
By no means does mandatory certification place Deer Alliance (HCAP) “at the centre of what is a commercial venture
Deer Alliance HCAP is a not-for-profit body, operating on a break-even basis and with full disclosure of all finances.
HCAP des not consist of merely of “answering 30 multi choice questions and attending a range test”. Candidates must answer a minimum of forty questions correctly,
and then passing a rigorous test of firearms handling and marksmanship
........ or for denigrating a process of assessment and certification recognised as fit for purpose by Coillte Teoranta and National Parks & Wildlife Service;
or for disrespecting the voluntary work of all those engaged in Deer Alliance HCAP,
including the different deer organisations such as the Irish Deer Society and the Wild Deer Association of Ireland, which have done far more for deer and for deer hunters than any other shooting organisation over the last forty years.