Rebelbrowser wrote: » Em...confused now. Meteociel has entirely different charts? See below. Anyone?
pad199207 wrote: » The Only saviour of hope I get from this absolute football of Model runs lately is that it’s a recurring cold signal that keeps getting picked up. If we don’t get some sort of cold event in December well then father dougal maguire might aswell be running the charts.
hatrickpatrick wrote: » Not sure that's fair tbh, the GFS is posted more in FI threads because it goes much further out into FI than the ECM.
Gaoth Laidir wrote: » Until the ECM shows something then I'm not biting. The GFS is a joke of a model in comparison and is invariably the one that gets posted in this thread because of its outlandish swings and cold bias in northerly outbreaks.
arctictree wrote: » Those quickly developing LPs are very hard to predict a few days out, never mind a week. It'll probably be gone in the next run.
patneve2 wrote: » GFS 18z is one of the best runs I have seen in a while...doubt it will end up like that
pistolpetes11 wrote: » Was just about to post the same
George Sunsnow wrote: » According to Nick on net weather who’s obviously looked at The US met services tech discussion ,the overnight ECM is for the bin “ NOAA have just called the ECM 00hrs run outlandish ! They have serious doubts over this mornings op run which is good news because it was dreadful from a cold perspective! “