A Little Pony wrote: » Why are some people actually arguing the case for this guy?
A Little Pony wrote: » His whole story smells of sh*t. Imagine travelling to Egypt from Ireland to protest in favour of implementing the barbaric Sharia law into the constitution. No wonder he got locked up.
end of the road wrote: » A Little Pony wrote: » Why are some people actually arguing the case for this guy? that's the thing, there is no actual case. he was acquitted of all charges. A Little Pony wrote: » His whole story smells of sh*t. Imagine travelling to Egypt from Ireland to protest in favour of implementing the barbaric Sharia law into the constitution. No wonder he got locked up. no no, he went to egypt to visit relatives and then went to a protest or more protests. the protests were over the murdering of protesters protesting the overthrow of the government. so he didn't get locked up for supposibly wanting sharia law to be implemented into the constitution. murdering protesters, now there is a crime, and who caried that out? the egyptian military.
Sweetemotion wrote: » Is there any evidence of his two "best friends" getting killed?
PeterParker957 wrote: » I highly doubt that.
end of the road wrote: » that's the thing, there is no actual case. he was acquitted of all charges. no no, he went to egypt to visit relatives and then went to a protest or more protests. the protests were over the murdering of protesters protesting the overthrow of the government. so he didn't get locked up for supposibly wanting sharia law to be implemented into the constitution. murdering protesters, now there is a crime, and who caried that out? the egyptian military.
end of the road wrote: » he was demonstrating how far he could close his hand when shot back in 2013, 4 years ago. he never claimed that he couldn't close his hand now, in 2017.
Omackeral wrote: » That's what he said, is it? You sure about that?
end of the road wrote: » that's what happened.
humphrys wrote: » I think what EOTR is saying is that because the video of Ibrahim saying he has been at the protests since 28 June (i.e. 6 weeks before arrest) is on my website, therefore that is not Ibrahim in the video saying he has been at the protests since 28 June. Is that your theory, EOTR? Don't be shy. Spell out your theory.
deco nate wrote: » Please explain how you know...
end of the road wrote: » because i watched the late late show interview where he gave the demonstration.
end of the road wrote: » deco nate wrote: » Please explain how you know... because i watched the late late show interview where he gave the demonstration.
end of the road wrote: » it was 4 years since he was shot, so i presume that his hand healed within that timeframe. so him closing his hand, just like the whole appearance on the lls doesn't disprove that he was shot, and that his hand didn't suffer injury at the time. the way he stated it says to me that at the time of being shot, he couldn't close his hand all the way, and he can now.
end of the road wrote: » i did see the interview. he was definitely demonstrating how much he could close his hand when he was shot and didn't state in anyway that it wasn't healed now.
Omackeral wrote: » Well it's not. Because I just watched it back on the RTE Player right now and this is what he said. ''I can't bend it properly, it doesn't close more than that'' and shows Ryan. He's talking present tense, not about four years ago. You've been exposed as a liar again. Here's the link. Go to 13:15https://www.rte.ie/player/ie/show/the-late-late-show-68/10798264/ Can't wait for your snivelling response, if it comes.
end of the road wrote: » yeah he was demonstrating how it worked after he was shot.
Sweetemotion wrote: » end of the road wrote: » because i watched the late late show interview where he gave the demonstration. You do know that clip is still on the rte website.https://www.rte.ie/player/ie/show/the-late-late-show-extras-30003017/10798275/ 11 minute mark is the demonstration. He said no such thing, you're as big a liar as he is.
dav3 wrote: » I can't believe some people are still getting hysterical over this. Has any new evidence come to light to prove that he is guilty of anything, or is it just the same mentally deranged loons spinning regurgitated conspiratorial nonsense? Never mind, I've just read the last few pages, same old, same old.
Omackeral wrote: » He said he can't close it now. He then closes it. He lied. I saw. The nation saw. I watched it again just now. I linked it above. You can watch it again. Have some integrity and/or credibility. It's ok to admit you were wrong..... or lying through your teeth.
end of the road wrote: » i'm satisfied that it was exactly as i said it was.