Are Am Eye wrote: » Sure I can take wee look at that for you.
redcup342 wrote: » Isn't there a thread about saying travellers
rgossip30 wrote: » Anyone been scammed by a roofer recently . A check on the roof section in the golden pageshardly a definitive source of information reveals that most companies are not registered . I doubt they have any screening of such companies .The review system on those advertising is almost non existent . They claim C2 vat, insurancehow do you know they are not and use only mobile numbers whats wrong with a mobile no. most self employed aren't sitting at home waiting for the landline to ringand no or a fake addresshow do you know the address is fake .You suspect a scam call the guards and ask for receipt to justify the charge .A scam roofer in my area has a large van with his logo doing this for years . He just changes the company name . The government is still dragging heels on legislation to register companies in the building trade .agreed but that's a separate issue
Harry Palmr wrote: » Ageing panel van with no name/number? Rough looking fellas inside? They're not registered.
rgossip30 wrote: » Anyone been scammed by a roofer recently . A check on the roof section in the golden pages reveals that most companies are not registered . I doubt they have any screening of such companies .The review system on those advertising is almost non existent . They claim C2 vat, insurance and use only mobile numbers and no or a fake address .You suspect a scam call the guards and ask for receipt to justify the charge .A scam roofer in my area has a large van with his logo doing this for years . He just changes the company name . The government is still dragging heels on legislation to register companies in the building trade .
K.Flyer wrote: » A lot of tradesmen don't signwrite vans anymore. It tells would be thieves what may be inside and also some insurance companies are loading the premium for that reason.
Harry Palmr wrote: » Interesting. In my day the van was a mobile advert.
SEPT 23 1989 wrote: » McDonagh & Associates