nee wrote: » Well I guess you could say that about any group of people's concerns that politician's take on. In fact it's an important part of the process tbf. Not in a parish pump kind of a way, but in a connected to its citizens, reflexive and responsive kind of way.
magicbastarder wrote: » (i say that while actually knowing a senator who's very good, so now i feel guilty)
RobFowl wrote: » Ronan Mullen ?
lennymc wrote: » Palpatine. Look at what he did for Naboo. Put it on the map he did.
Lumen wrote: » I don't think that being a bit blind is a defence against being a lazy tub of lard who takes policy advice from taxi drivers. We have fully blind people competing internationally in cycling.
Of course one can argue that making jokes about people's physical appearance is poor form, but that's a completely separate issue.
Lumen wrote: » We have fully blind people competing internationally in cycling.
Harrybelafonte wrote: » Who have pilots. You wanna offer to be his pilot?
Lumen wrote: » He wouldn't want me, I have neither the engine nor the bike control They have pilots when competing, but AFAIK turbo trainers don't need pilots.
CramCycle wrote: » I always feel like I am going to be late when I get on the turbo to go to work
tomasrojo wrote: » If I swap out some links to facilitate using the power link, will that mean I don't have to take off the rear wheel to temporarily introduce some slack?
cdaly_ wrote: » If you can run the chain off the chainring so it's loose in your hand to join, then you should be able to run it back onto the chainring when you're done. You're supposed to have a bit of slack in the chain anyway IIRC.
rollingscone wrote: » Eventually I just called him an idiot then lost my dignity when my chain dropped halfway across the junction.
rollingscone wrote: » Today I made the classic mistake of arguing with an idiot. Some guy on a Dublin bike kept charging ahead of me at the lights from the canal cyclepath and then slowing right down. I passed him again, then he shoulted something at me and when he caught up with me at the next set of lights said I shouldn't be passing him as I was slowing him down. It was taking me "a half an hour to clip in", I didn't think of it at the time, and just noted he kept pulling in front of me and slowing right down. Eventually I just called him an idiot then lost my dignity when my chain dropped halfway across the junction. It was only after I took off again and was trying to remember if I'd had any trouble clipping in at any poiint that it dawned on me. His "taking half an hour to clip in" was me waiting with my foot on the pedal for the green bicycle instead of just tearing through the pedestrian lights. alas, so much moral highground wasted.
manafana wrote: » I have admit to not waiting for green bikes, but I always cross with caution prepared to yield, the bike green lights on or two of the crossing points on canal are so short. A yellow bike would be better but then a few people would think they don't need to yield, which happens very seldom to be fair
rollingscone wrote: » It's just another example of bad infrastructure that pushes cyclists and pedestrians into conflict.