lazybones32 wrote: » Hugs are for women and children; men should wrestle to achieve dominance and superiority.
frag420 wrote: » If men have to wrestle than women should partake in some Foxy Boxing...fait if fair!
suicide_circus wrote: » I prefer a firm handshake myself
splinter65 wrote: » I wouldn’t do it any more. I’ve stopped. Sometimes my customers give me hugs and I USED to give hugs, not any more. I also used to do little things ( grasp a hand etc) to physically comfort distressed customers, not any more. I’m a 52 year old female.
Bellerstring wrote: » Is giving somebody a hug to be avoided nowadays? In what sphere is it permissable and when is it a complete no- no?
Dr Crayfish wrote: » I'm not a hugging person, I have friends from England and every time I see them they insist on hugging me, hella awkward for me. Irish people didn't even shake hands till the 90s or so, apparently. My parents and I were talking about this recently. All this hugging and I love you crap has been imported here from watching Friends or something. Bring back physical and emotional suppression is what I always say.
Boom_Bap wrote: » Hugs Not Drugs
mfceiling wrote: » The whole hug carry on is a bit baffling to me. Neighbours invite us for a drink on Saturday night. See them at 7.30 when I'm nipping to the shop to buy a bottle of wine (at least a tenner, I'm no cheapskate). "Are you still ok for 8 o'clock? "...cue 5 minutes small talk about babysitters etc. Arrive back, say bye to the kids and walk across to their house. Hug central on the doorstep. Why? I was only chatting to you 30 minutes ago. It's not like I haven't washed up like Terry Waites after years in captivity.
anna080 wrote: » I don't think I was hugged enough as a child because I genuinely do not like hugs.
snowflaker wrote: » Hugs are for insecure people. Firm handshake ftw