velo.2010 wrote: » What qualification they have is beside the point. We train guards, teachers, doctors, nurses etc. with the expectation to work in the public service - because we have a public service which need such people.
velo.2010 wrote: » We train Gardaí to serve in the state and we train the defence forces to do similar. Its possible to expect doctors and nurses to stay at home and serve the country for a period.
seamus wrote: » It may require higher spending in health
the_syco wrote: » State pays for the Gardai and army training. State doesn't pay for training for the doctors and nurses.
the_syco wrote: » Shall we reduce the Welfare payments to fund this?
Anita Blow wrote: » Ask yourself why the majority of doctors coming out of college are choosing to move abroad.
velo.2010 wrote: » State pays for third level tuition fees under the 'Free Fees initiative' for. students pay the contribution charge for student services etc.
velo.2010 wrote: » If its because it shows the dire state the service is in, then it should be the catalyst to do something about it and start by doubling down the all party agreement on the 10 year plan for free healthcare and the phasing out of private practise in public hospitals. However, if the answer is - because they see senior consultants earning the sort of money they will never earn - then I think they should question why they decided to plump for medicine in the first place.
Anita Blow wrote: » Why is it the onus of the young in this country to make some noble sacrifice for a government and public which holds them in such contempt? A line in the sand has to be drawn somewhere if we are to get a handle on things. We all paid for the sh1tstorm of the financial crisis and we got over it... sort of. I do agree though with many of the points you've made here.
A line in the sand has to be drawn somewhere if we are to get a handle on things. We all paid for the sh1tstorm of the financial crisis and we got over it... sort of. I do agree though with many of the points you've made here.
velo.2010 wrote: The problem is, even if you have private only hospitals, I think you'll still have an overlap with public hospitals, which is not acceptable IMO.
SEPT 23 1989 wrote: » did i hear correctly that one scrounger was only doing 13 hours a week for their 200k a year?
arctictree wrote: » Simple solution is to just train more doctors. Double the places. Anyone ever hear of an unemployed doctor?
Berserker wrote: » Very much the exception. My OH is an A&E doc and she told me that the consultants she deals with put in the hours. Nope, you need people who are smart enough to be doctors and want to be doctors. It's a very long, hard slog.
seamus wrote: » We can increase taxes. We have space for it, no matter how much wailing may be done. The aim should be to reduce costs in the long-term - close unnecessary hospitals & increase bed capacities at larger hospitals. So a short term increase in funding in order to clear a blockage is well worth it.
Ipso wrote: » No part would get elected on a slogan that has higher taxes in it. Irish people say they want good public services but don't want to pay for and don't seem to hold people accountable.
Moomintroll99 wrote: » I think it ignored the reality of the way consultants operate. Our 5 yr old has cancer and attends Crumlin. Most of the first few weeks he was there, he saw consultants at ridiculous times - 4 in the morning etc as an emergency, weekends, nights etc. When more junior staff saw him they often called consultants for advice at random times in the night. Ward round started at 8 every morning with time going over notes etc beforehand. Those guys were incredibly hard working, doing insane hours with limited resources. Stalking them between 9 and 5 would be completely irrelevant to their weekly hours. The biggest issue for parents at Crumlin is resources, not consultants' hours. Try talking to the parents of kids with spina bifida and scoliosis. They need specialised operating theatres, which Crumlin does have, but which HSE only funds a day or two each week - other days the facilities sit idle while kids suffer. I can see how it's two tier for the higher margin/less life and death stuff, like hip and knee replacements in adults, but when you have super-specialised stuff like paediatric scoliosis surgey or obscure kinds of childhood cancer in a country with a small population, how can you possibly have a 'private market' on the side? Our boy has a kind of cancer that comes up in about 3 kids per year in Ireland. There's literally only one guy who has the skills to treat him, and one hospital with the facilities. It's got to be funded centrally according to need. HSE just wants to shift the blame on to 'greedy doctors' because it's easier than the systemic change and big spending that's actually needed in health funding.
Sleepy wrote: Honestly, I still haven't gotten my head around why private medical practice was ever allowed in the first place.
seamus wrote: The aim should be to reduce costs in the long-term - close unnecessary hospitals & increase bed capacities at larger hospitals. So a short term increase in funding in order to clear a blockage is well worth it.
seamus wrote: » The aim should be to reduce costs in the long-term - close unnecessary hospitals
irish gent wrote: » I have private health insurance since April 2015. I joined it before they put a loading on your age that time . 76 euro a month I pay. I went to specsavers to get my eyes tested and was told I have the start of a cataract . So I called the Insurance company to see if I was covered so in the end, I got and the surgeon got, an approval letter to go ahead . I got the job done 13 weeks ago and now the Insurance company are not paying out because they said it was a pre-conditioning ailment that I had after getting the letter of approval .. My surgeon was annoyed at the Insurance company and the way they are handling it. It costs me 150 euro a visit each time I go to the Private hospital.So far over 850 euro I have paid in to it . I can claim back 60 euro of it I was told by the Insurance Company what a joke. I watched prime time and was very sad over seeing this. Believe me I was told to take up the private health because of my age now I begin to wonder ????
Anita Blow wrote: » Why is it the onus of the young in this country to make some noble sacrifice for a government and public which holds them in such contempt? Would you yourself work a 30 hour+ shift and be paid for half of it? Would you work a 10 hour day each day and only paid for 8? Would you accept your employer routinely breaking the law and rostering you for illegally long rotas, knowing you can't just clock out at 5 because you'd be letting your patients down? Would you accept only being put on a 4 month contract at a time and being emergency taxed every 4 months? The hassle of trying to get a mortgage or loan when you can't demonstrate you're employed beyond the next 4 months? Would you accept moving around the country every 4-6 months for the 10 or so years until you can become consultant? Having to try maintain a family life, often holding down more than one rental lease because you can't find accommodation on such short leases? Would you accept the utter contempt the public hold for you working an 80 hour week for 33k as an intern? Would you accept working in a country where your 90k loan (which nearly half of graduates will have) will limit you from owning a house because the government doesn't offer tax relief on it while other western countries do? This isn't even half of the **** doctors have to put up with.
Red_Wake wrote: » Neither the Gardai nor the Defence Forces have a qualification which can be used abroad. Your example is very flawed.