pjohnson wrote: » You must have loved Brunker and the gang yesterday so.
Ursus Horribilis wrote: » Oh don't get me started. It was like an episode of Loose Women. And when one tried to make a legitimate point - that sometimes people can be stupid when they're young and hold opinions they wouldn't when they get older - she was shot down. By a woman who then admitted she calls people out on things she disagrees with and she has lots of rows with them.
Ursus Horribilis wrote: » The three guests format is a disaster. It has also changed from a nice end of week, lighter side of the news item into something horrible. They did not need to tinker with it.
CatFromHue wrote: » yeah, a lot of the stories discussed are stories that are being discussed everywhere already.
Vorenus400 wrote: » Not one word of it on Ivan yates. I imagine the Cooper stuff will include reading out a statement from management and very little discussion
walshb wrote: » now RTE have an issue with him
walshb wrote: » Talk about a mountain out of a molehill. This lad has been on promoting smut and vulgarity on every show he has been involved in, and now RTE have an issue with him due to him "behaving" inappropriately when on his own time?
ThisRegard wrote: » I think you'll find RTE are right down the pecking order considering he doesn't even work for them.
donaghs wrote: » There is a difference between talking about stuff "in character", and actually doing it to other people.
whiterebel wrote: » He did a couple of years back on Republic of Telly.
neris wrote: » very soft interview with that Hallowa chap
quintana76 wrote: » Think Matt is looking for a job in RTE or maybe a column in the IT. He has gone full libtard over the last 6 months or so. He is is following the rule book to the letter.
BPKS wrote: » What else did you expect. I'd say Matt had a Cheerleaders uniform with IBRAHIM written on it during the interview.
jack hackett wrote: » How come Matt didnt present the show last night but was able to do the tonight show?