Deleted User wrote: » Yeah, they're the problem here alright
Bananaleaf wrote: » It is fairly extreme action to have to take when you are that young. But, if you are in a high profile position and you rely on the public opinion to earn your crust, then you behave in a way that is likely to damage that public opinion, you have to kind of expect that.
PARlance wrote: » List of things I can't believe about Al Porter: 1. He has a radio show 2. He has a TV show 3. He is 24
FizzleSticks wrote: » Anyone whose been behind the scenes on the comedy scene knows this kind of carry on is rampant but a lot of people are acting like this is highly unlikely.
Stheno wrote: » You've kinda made my point there the behaviour is not proven it is alleged and Porter now finds himself unemployed and likely unemployable full stop for the near future in any capacity in ireland at least.
Stheno wrote: » You've kinda made my point there the behaviour is not proven it is alleged and Porter now finds himself unemployed and likely unemployable full stop for the near future in any capacity in ireland at least. Unless this goes to court and he finds himself incarcerated, how do you suggest he will support himself? He was most likely self employed so not entitled to social welfare and at 24 it's unlikely he's saved a huge amount to help him disappear for a few years
Venom wrote: » Why would he apologize for this "alleged" behavior if he hadn't done anything wrong?
vicwatson wrote: » No self employed pay a slightly less prsi contribution hence there be no “entitlement”
Bananaleaf wrote: » Genuine question - how is he not entitled to social welfare because he was self-employed? There are people in the country who haven't been in any way employed and they are still 'entitled' to it. I know they don't have pension rights, but are you sure they're not entitled to social welfare? Also, like I said, I don't know him at all, so I've no idea whether he would have money put away, so fair enough I don't know where he will find the money to hole himself away for a few years, but what are you suggesting will happen to him if you don't think a job or social welfare are a possibility and if he doesn't go to jail (or even if he does, upon his release)?
Stheno wrote: » Did you read his apology? He basically said that he didn't realise people were hurt/offended and he never meant there to be hurt or offense?
Bananaleaf wrote: » But those who pay no PRSI contribution and never have are? Well, I'm more shocked at that than I am at the allegations. Anyway - yes he said he apologised if his behaviour hurt people, but to have meant this, he also had to be admitting to the behaviour
Venom wrote: » Are you and he for fcuking real? He didn't think walking up to random strangers and grabbing their dicks in public, would cause offense or make them feel uncomfortable? Talk about needing to see
Dev84 wrote: » Lets not forget that the lad is 24 and could easily be reading this page. As bad as his alleged actions are he didnt rape or kill anyone. Anyone know if any of the victims have gone to the police?
Vladimir Poontang wrote: » Imagine the difference if these allegations were against George Hook or Kevin Myers? A lot of hypocrisy and double standards being exposed here.