Del2005 wrote: » Should only upper class people be allowed large TVs?
Greentopia wrote: » Upper class people don't own TVs.
Greentopia wrote: » Mine is my iMac for when I want to watch a TV channel. Got rid of the telly years ago as I rarely watched it. Bonus is no licence or subscription service to pay for.
retalivity wrote: » 0in - Havent had a tv since 2009.
Ash.J.Williams wrote: » That doesn't disqualify from tv license does it?
Mrs OBumble wrote: » +1 ... 'cept 2007 in my case. Generation NTV is still the hippest one in town. And we have more brain cells 'cos we don't have an Idiot Box sucking them out of us.
Sonics2k wrote: » Still need a TV licence indeed.
Wibbs wrote: » 42 inch plasma(Panasonic).
harr wrote: » My plasma gave up the ghost last year best telly I ever had..still don’t understand why they stopped producing them..
One eyed Jack wrote: » Big energy consumers apparently -http://blogs.ec.europa.eu/ECintheUK/banning-plasma-tvs-2/ Two reasons I bought LCD over plasma at the time were that plasma screens had an issue with "burn-in" and ironically -ghosting, where you could switch channels and still have an image of the previous channel on the screen. Also this was around the time when people were hooking their desktop computers up to their TV for 'media centres', and the screen resolution on a plasma TV left a lot to be desired over an LCD TV screen. I'm just grateful I missed the whole "3D" phase, I was invited along to a demo one night, obviously the effect was a bit lost on me :pac: 4K TVs though, definitely not just marketing speak. I was admiring one recently when the shop assistant came over - "Can I help you with anything?", "Nah, I just need to go change my pants", they really are something else!!