sonofenoch wrote: » Not annoyed just pointing out as I see it........you even had one bod yesterday pointing out he doesn't actually make whiskey himself or tailer suits? it was a serious critique :cool: ....getting ridiculous
hatrickpatrick wrote: » Does it matter though? Guinness isn't representing Ireland in any official capacity, but it's pretty cool to know that a beer brewed in my home country is one of the most popular beers in the world. U2 aren't representing Ireland in an official capacity, but it certainly feels goos as an Irishman when a band from my home country wins a grammy. Humans are tribal creatures at heart, and seeing somebody from one's own tribe attaining international recognition feels good psychologically. Hence why, for example, people who have absolutely no interest in football teams will often still cheer for Ireland and get properly invested in watching the world cup or the euros. I'm pretty sure this is a fairly deep rooted human thing, which a lot of people share in without necessarily thinking about why.
Asus X540L wrote: » Guinness? U2? Humans are"tribal" Seriously?
Tazzimus wrote: » And I'm still waiting for the point you were trying to make
PhilipsR wrote: » Who gives a **** if he didn't actually push him?
Him being in the bloody ring caused the danger to the dazed fighter on his knees!
"Your man took some big shots. Thought it could have been stopped earlier. Referees need to be on the ball a little bit."
sonofenoch wrote: » No? ok .....you asked do people think he makes whiskey himself out in the garden shed or his bird knocks up a suit in the spare bedroom on a sewing machine? what people do you think thought that? are you implying McGregor gave the impression he did?
You're right, though... I don't see who in their right mind would actually buy McGregor whiskey or his suits over actual reputable makers of those things.
Do people think Micheal Jordan ever sewed up a pair of Nike Air's ? no they don't ....he just put his name on them, go figure
You're right, though... I don't see who in their right mind would actually buy Jordan sneakers or clothing over actual reputable makers of those things.
sonofenoch wrote: » So there are some who thought McGregor had a hand in making these things? well more fool them ...
EagererBeaver wrote: » Fair enough if that's your view on it. I couldn't care less if U2 won Grammys to be honest. I literally feel nothing about whether they win or lose. As for the Guinness analogy, it has a wee bit more history behind it than McGregor but these days it's owned by a global mega corporation and the majority of it, I believe, is brewed and sold in Africa. It's Irish but it's not.
Outlaw Pete wrote: » So, I should just have ignored the comments saying McGregor pushed Goddard or an official into Redmond should I? Nah, I ain't no sheep, chief. You wanna join in with the kicking and bandying about of untruths, that's your business. Nope, him jumping into the octagon (while certainly pretentious and dickish) was in and of itself, harmless, and had the fight been been over (as McGregor had understandably presumed it was) then it would have been a non event, just as it was when he jumped in the cage in Belfast. Don't get me wrong, I think he should be punished for lashing out and slapping that official who tried to push him off the cage, as even though the guy could have seriously hurt him, he was just doing his job.... but he shouldn't be blamed for all that occurred in that ring is what I'm saying. No fcuking way should he. Had Goddard done his job and focused on Redmond as soon as he had told Charlie to go to go back to his corner (and let the officials do their job with regards to getting Conor out of the octagon) then most likely none of what subsequently transpired, would have done. But instead he doubled back on his way over to Redmond and antagonized McGregor physically. THAT is what directly led to McGregor then running over and pushing him. Also, had the idiot in the shirt and tie not rushed over and pushed the official into Redmond, then Redmond wouldn't have fallen over. Now that that is dealt with, let me move on to deal with some of the other nonsense I've been reading. Specifically the sanctimonious rubbish that McGregor's using the death of Joao Carvalho and is lying when he suggests that it was something that contributed to him losing it. First of all, given that this was Charlie's first fight in Dublin since the Carvalho fight, I'd imagine it was something that was on all the minds that day, if not the entire week and secondly, there is every reason to believe him given that immediately after the Carvalho fight he said: Now here he was, celebrating with Charlie (no pun intended) and then all of sudden he hears the referee saying the fight isn't over! That it's to continue! Even though he has just seen an opponent knocked out! So how can it be so inconceivable (as it appears to be to the majority of you) that he's being honest when he's says part of the reason he initially lost it was because he felt the same crap was happening again or could happen again, a referee was not stopping a fight despite it being clear that it should be. I mean, to me it would be bizarre if the Carvalho fight did not come into his head at that moment. I could perhaps understand some slight doubt to his sincerity, especially from certain circles, but I certainly don't see anything to justify people that were fans of his calling him a liar in that regard. McGregor can be a wanker, no doubt about it, but I've never had him down as someone who would lie about something like that and I don't see anyone posting anything to justify that contention either. Perhaps they will, look forward to it.
PhilipsR wrote: » Jesus Christ, i'm out.
sonofenoch wrote: » I'll tell you if you tell me what your point was No? ok .....you asked do people think he makes whiskey himself out in the garden shed or his bird knocks up a suit in the spare bedroom on a sewing machine? what people do you think thought that? are you implying McGregor gave the impression he did? Do people think Micheal Jordan ever sewed up a pair of Nike Air's ? no they don't ....he just put his name on them, go figure
The Nal wrote: » Heres another bedwetterhttps://lovin.ie/opinion/ive-always-been-a-diehard-mcgregor-fan-but-thats-all-changed-now
Outlaw Pete wrote: » Now that that is dealt with, let me move on to deal with some of the other nonsense I've been reading. Specifically the sanctimonious rubbish that McGregor's using the death of Joao Carvalho and is lying when he suggests that it was something that contributed to him losing it.
Faugheen wrote: » Some people really need to read Marc Goddards statement. There's a man who admitted and accepted he got something wrong. His statement has far more credibility than McGregor looking out for a fighter who might suffer the same fate as Joao Carvalho.
rob316 wrote: » Is he worth as much as he says he is driving around in a 152 i8? I sure as hell wouldn't be if I was worth his money.