sKeith wrote: » Please see my comment on rolz. you are not rolling correctly.
Tigger wrote: » whats he doing wrong his con is 15 he rolled a d20 and got max now he ****s himself
sKeith wrote: » when using rolz, you must type #d20 to get a role of a 20 sided dice. if you type #20, it will say xxx roles 20 = 20. every time. there is no chance involved, you just roll 20. or 100, or 1000, or whatever number you put in #42. xxx roles 42.
Tigger wrote: » oh im usinghttps://www.brockjones.com/dieroller/dice.htm i always use it is there a room i should be using so you can see my rolls i havent rolled anything yet
Digital Solitude wrote: » We're using rolz.org, the room is called Boards.ie D&D
Banjo wrote: » In a traditional game we wouldn't have the ability to pore over every word the DM uttered at our leisure - maybe it's intentional?
Digital Solitude wrote: » Con is 15, I rolled a 20.
sKeith wrote: » Fourier, How come you are making new threads for each new Act. For searching purposes, maybe we could allow single threads to last a bit longer.
I've never played traditional WW (werewolf), but i have played forum WW, and I'm not sure if during a traditional game of WW people pore over every utterance you make, but in forum WW, they certainly do, you'll be scrutinized for capitalizing some word Halfway through a sentence etc.
Necrominus wrote: » BTW, sKeith, me thinks you should take those undecipherable papers in the drawer
Lord TSC wrote: I think I could, possibly, understand them with my "Read Magic" skill, but since I only get one spell a day, it would leave me pretty useless if everything else kicks off, especially if the papers are just, you know, papers...
Fourier wrote: I should be a bit clearer about why it is standard. Typically the reason given is that it is easier to search, as each thread contains a specific piece of the story, but I never really questioned it. What do others think, is a single long thread easier to search? Maybe I should make a main thread with links to every other thread?
Mollyb60 wrote: Meh. I'm fine with how it is. I think it would be easier in its own subforum though (yes I know I've harped on about this before lol).
Tigger wrote: » best way tonget a subforum is fill upna parent forun with busy threads so i think the act one scene 3 idea is the best then you can just search the forum to find the posts you need as well
sKeith wrote: » Maybe you need a game identifier tagged on, like D&D_Game4_act2_scene6 so we can then search the sub forum for game4 and search term, otherwise you would be finding the term from every other game that is ongoing or gone before.
Necrominus wrote: » Seriously, what is Dwarrowwood????
