dulux99 wrote: » Some of the stuff I've read in this thread has left me truly bewildered. Cocaine doesn't make you act all hyped up, we shouldn't judge him too much cos he fights for a living, the official and red pushed him first.... I just can't fathom how any decent respectful fully grown adult could view his knacker actions last night and not be turned off the man. His actions were the actions of a knacker and a bully who is using his stature to just belittle people everywhere he goes. And I say that as someone who's been following his career for years and has paid hard earned money to follow him half way around the world multiple times.
raze_them_all_ wrote: » ....yes it does.
Richard tea wrote: » Massive fan of conors and still am ( in the octagon) but there is no defending this.
cletus wrote: » Being a professional fighter does not mean that you can strike people with impunity.
Outlaw Pete wrote: » If this had been Nick Diaz jumping in the ring after a Nate fight, where he had only went at a ref after the ref and went at him, and slapped the head of some ring security guy that had tried to push him off the cage, it'd be: "Nick's a legend!" It's the fight game, not badminton. He's not blameless of course....but total overreaction here.
walshb wrote: » I didn’t see it but was there a real need to push a man off a cage, possibly seriously injuring him..?
Effects wrote: » He made it clear he was intent on assaulting the ref. .
LastLagoon wrote: » Feel like a gimp for defending him in the past ,so many people saw him for what he is,a nasty little scrote,but I fell for the marketing and BS. Hope he gets slept by his next opponent,I’m out
The Nal wrote: » Yeah, there was a hurt fighter in the cage and McGregors behaviour was interferring with that. If theres no marketing and BS you end up with Tyron Woodely or the Klitschkos. Im all for marketing and BS. People take it way too seriously.
walshb wrote: » From atop the cage? Whether he should or should not have been there is irrelevant.
walshb wrote: » Effects wrote: » He made it clear he was intent on assaulting the ref. . From atop the cage? Whether he should or should not have been there is irrelevant. I wouldn’t run someone over in my car just because I may be in the right.
LastLagoon wrote: » I’ll take a Woodley who fights the best guys who are put in front of him then a ducking diving weasel anyway.guarantee woodley will end up having more of a legacy (on paper anyway) then mcgregor
Tigger wrote: » your post history isnt that you defended him ?
glasso wrote: » probably the worst thing about this is the fact that there was a hurt fighter on the ground in the cage and McGregor didn't give a sh1t and jumped in and made it all about him and hindered the care the guy might have needed. obviously has no respect for the sport that made him rich.
Tigger wrote: » hes not a member of the public hes friends with Charlie and hes the most famous Irish MMA fighter ever probably the most famous MMA fighter ever at an Irish gig i personally thought it could have gone worse i do think he looked very immature in the ring tho
Gamebred wrote: » Has Kavanagh made a comment yet? if it was his fighter ko'd on the deck and this happened he'd be threatening to pull fighters from promotions I reckon.
Zero-Cool wrote: » https://twitter.com/John_Kavanagh/status/929315983885520902