Caranica wrote: » We'd be naiive to think that this is limited only to the Gate within the theatre world and theatre within society. It's endemic and I'm surprised that people are so surprised to hear these stories
Deusexmachina wrote: » It’s not endemic. You have zero evidence for that asssertion. Colgan sounds like a horror.these people are the exception, not the norm. Exaggerating the issue belittles it.
Caranica wrote: » I am a woman and barely a day goes by without misogyny and sexual harassment. Funnily enough I also have female friends and they all say the same. It's not the exception, it's the rule.
Joeytheparrot wrote: » You have zero evidence for your assertion
cloudatlas wrote: » If you read through the accounts by the women it wasn't just him who behaved inapporpriately and it seems a lot of the management at the theatre supported his behaviour also http://gracedyas.tumblr.com/post/ive-been-thinking-about-michael-colgan-a-lot There was definitely a culture of bullying at the Gate not just Colgan sadly.
smurgen wrote: » Jesus he sounds like a right piece of work! And paid 231 k a year?!fairly pissed.at the men turning a blind eye to it all.
Dennis Tight Woodchuck wrote: » You know, drama llama remarks like that really don't help the situation.
RayM wrote: » smurgen wrote: » Jesus he sounds like a right piece of work! And paid 231 k a year?!fairly pissed.at the men turning a blind eye to it all. Rightly or wrongly, I think lots of people - men and women - turned a blind eye to his behaviour because his threat that they'd never work in Dublin again was taken seriously.
smurgen wrote: » You're right but i was thinking of one of the stories in one of the link where he smacked an employee on the arse hard in front of a room of men,then he grabbed her wrist and she tried to leave.the woman said all the men looking off in different directions.i'd like to think i would have acted differently in that situation.
Deleted User wrote: » I'm taking a large pinch of salt with everything that I hear about through social or print media that on face value should be going through either a workplace relations process or criminal/civil legal proceedings Weinstein hasn't changed that tbh.
Candie wrote: » If your livelihood depends on not seeing something, it can be easy to not see it. They were in an awful position, and while I like to think I'd be the one to stand up, I might be cowardly too if it meant losing everything. If more than one stood up, it'd be easier. As we see from the tsunami of allegations tumbling out of Weinsteins alleged victims, there's safety in numbers.
currants wrote: » See I agree with your point for the more junior members of staff-the women he was allegedly harassing, hitting and humiliating ritually. But I cant understand how any member of the management team could justify (to themselves)keeping quiet, morally or legally. I hope those women sue the organisation successfully, money is the only thing that will make boards of management take action against this type of crime.