faceman wrote: » Also an interesting read about the 8 vs X.https://www.theverge.com/2017/10/23/16519388/iphone-8-plus-vs-iphone-x-comparison
Marty Bird wrote: » Coming from a 128GB 7 I’ll be going with the 256GB X.
DivingDuck wrote: » "When you buy an iPhone X, you’re buying into Apple’s vision for the future of the smartphone. When you buy an iPhone 8, you’re buying the best version of the present." This chap is spot on, and all of this this is exactly the reason I got the 8 Plus a while ago. Very happy with it so far— cheaper, a nice improvement over the 6 Plus I'd had since launch, was easy to get and available sooner, and no need to faff about with things I don't want like Face ID. I can't say I would recommend it over the X as I haven't so much as touched that, but I can definitely say it's a good phone that I'd recommend on its own merits.
Blazer wrote: » It looks like faceid won’t be anywhere as accurate as Apple claimed. The latest story is due to yield issues for the chip Apple has reduced the accuracy requirements for it. I wasn’t impressed with it at all so I definitely thinking i’ll be waiting for gen2 .http://flip.it/OrjRFU
[font=Tiempos, Georgia, serif]Apple claims Face ID’s accuracy is 1,000,000:1, compared to 50,000:1 for Touch ID. If Apple has reduced the accuracy based on these figures, the company will still be able to claim that Face ID is far more accurate than Touch ID.[/font]
iancairns wrote: » Where you seeing details on ID mobile re iPhone X? Juts curious. Also I'm due upgrade with Three on November 3rd. Raging. Gonna ring up at 8.01am on Friday and see can they get round this. That said Three reception in my house has been non existent last 2 months so will make me reconsider. Contract ends in January might shop around early. Last question, is it possible to get the X sim free in the states? I was nearly sure I read on hear you could but can't find how. Thanks,
murpho999 wrote: » I just don't think that Apple would release something that doesn't work
iancairns wrote: » I'm assuming all carrier websites will be updated today with details on iPhone X or is it at 8am tomorrow page refreshes and boom there it is? Just seems weird that one day out zero updates on any carrier about it?
murpho999 wrote: » Why not wait until the phone comes out and the real reviews come out before making your mind up based on an article without any real sources. I just don't think that Apple would release something that doesn't work and wouldn't just berate it because of the hiccup at the demo.
munstermagic11 wrote: » Like the antenna issue?
munstermagic11 wrote: » Like the antenna issue? I’m not sold on FaceID yet, def think you’re correct to see what the reviews and people here say when they get the X. I’d like to wait for the Xs. My own 2yr cycle has typically meant I got the s version; when the “new” phones have been corrected/improved.
flexcon wrote: » If my memory serves me right, there wasn't an issue with the Antenna. It was the algorithm that shows the signal bars was "overly sensitive". There was a keynote where Steve Jobs showed off that the antenna system performance was the same with all other phones except the software showed a drop off from full bars to 1 bar.
DubDJ wrote: » It was both, the signal definately could be interrupted with a certain grip, but the signal bars were incorrect based on software too. Still it was a ‘big’ issue at the time. I had the iPhone 4 and never had a complaint. My favorite iPhone design of all.
faceman wrote: » Sorry lads. Still not decided on 64 or 256. This is disastrous! Who is going with a 64gb?