devnull wrote: » Generally most re-brand exercises tend to be used in order to make a break with the past and start afresh and shake off any perceptions with the old brand that people may have which in turn makes them more likely to try and use said company again as they don't link the new brand with past bad experiences.
Claude Wilton wrote: » London simplified the mess of 1990s private liveries back to the traditional red. Probably too radically traditional for marketing and PR people to revert to the classic green and eau-de-nil livery that signified Dublin buses for years after the war Emergency
hardanro wrote: » I don't think there are any recent improvements in public transport.
Now 4-5 buses pass by without stopping between 8 and 9, and no sign of DB thinking of adjusting their fleet or increasing frequency to solve this problem. That's why people doesn't want to give up their car for a public transport. It's not an image problem, DB just doesn't have the capacity and the professionalism to handle more people.
If you are used to drive 45 minutes to work, would you give up your car in favor of a public transport where you wait that time only to get on a bus?
devnull wrote: » You say it doesn't have an image problem but straight away you indicate that it has a bad image and one of not having the capacity and professionalism to handle more people which you will most likely keep with you forever more and every time you see a Dublin Bus you will think of that and many people have similar views as you and they won't die in an instant, despite the fact the capacity is not down to Dublin Bus and they are more professional now than they ever have been. This year the Dublin Bus fleet is being increased by 30 buses to increase capacity and next year the orbital and local routes to be operated by Go-Ahead are being increased by 35% when it comes to frequency with Dublin Bus redeploying approx 100 vehicles to other routes so hopefully it should .
devnull wrote: » So it seems that things are moving forward, despite some of the rumours that we have seen to the contrary. I hope that they do not have a seperate website for their services, I really hope it all goes through TransportForIreland
Kopparberg Strawberry and Lime wrote: » Won't happen, If services etc are disrupted , they need to be announced everywhere as much as possible If I'm waiting for an 18 bus that is cancelled, it will need to be announced by them , by their website and Twitter etc Tfi will not give control of their website for this company to give info, and if its a case that go ahead will contact to to post the information it will take too much time and there will be communication errors etc. Not worth the hassle
Stephen15 wrote: » This will be a mammoth task as the NTA will need to recruit staff and most would likely have to convince DB staff to transfer over and given their current stance towards the NTA that would be highly unlikely.
bebeman wrote: » Have heard of zero interest in this other than a few close to retirement who have said maybe if DB offer redundancy package to cut the number of staff they might take it and then go work for go ahead, There might be a few new DB drivers who would move over to get marked in. I guess it depends on the pay and rosters.
bebeman wrote: » , There might be a few new DB drivers who would move over to get marked in..
2. Is the pension scheme for workers inferior under the new arrangements? # No. The NTA has ensured that the contract includes provisions for adequate pension arrangements for employees. # For staff recruited by the new service provider, the contract requires that a Pension Scheme (Defined Contribution) will be put in place whereby an employer contribution of up to 5%, matches the employee % contribution.
# The arrangements will also offer 4 times basic salary for death in service for single members and 10 times basic salary for married members. This would apply to either staff recruited directly by the new service provider, or to any Dublin Bus employees who choose to transfer to the new service provider.
devnull wrote: » Personally I don't agree with the whole marking in system, it's antiqued, it should pretty much be a rota system, all it does is create a divide between the people at the top of the chain and the bottom of the chain which unfortunately is a function of many unionised companies I've worked in.
bebeman wrote: » New drivers have more accidents than senior drivers. So its good to retain drivers as long as possible. The only thing that keeps people in the job is getting marked in. Depot has 10 routes, driver hates 3 routes, indifferent about 4, likes 2 and really like 1. Spare drivers do all routes, they swap duties and change shift to avoid routes they hate, its a bit of a mess. They eventually get marked in on indifferent route and over the years move to route they like. You remove the marking in system and force drivers to be spare and work all routes, you will have a high turn over of staff. No way will drivers stick around doing day in and day out routes they despise, unless there is the prospect of never doing them again, we call that marking in. There are junior routes and senior routes, you at first get marked in on junior routes, and all you want to do is get of the route and on to a decent one, the senior routes. Do you think drivers enjoy going into the lively areas of Dublin? We want to get marked in away from these routes, like all jobs the new guy gets the bad jobs, and over time he moves up the ladder and some other poor bastard get the bad routes.
Stephen15 wrote: » So from what you're trying to say why would want to get marked in on the 27 or the 77a as those routes have a high level of antisocial behaviour or would these only be operated by spares.
bebeman wrote: New drivers have more accidents than senior drivers. So its good to retain drivers as long as possible.
jimmycrackcorm wrote: » That's rubbish with no founding at all. Just making stuff up.
end of the road wrote: » it's not rubbish, but fact with plenty of founding. not making stuff up but reality.
Cookie_Monster wrote: » should be easy to provide proof so?
brokenarms wrote: » Most of the marked in drivers got it in 6 years or less. Some got it in one year. Now it's 10 years plus. A joke of a system. Bad duties for at least 10 years. I hope it's one of the first things to go with bus connects or pressure from the compition. It should be equal. For every worker. Regardless of experience.
It is found that, for drivers with up to eight years' service, there is a tendency for the older men to have fewer accidents than the youngest men of the same length of service. A marked improvement in the accident rates is shown to occur with increasing experience.
with comparable experience: younger drivers had higher accident rates than older ones. An increase of accident risk during the second year of employment after an initial decline could be detected in the younger group of drivers; the older group only showed a continuous decline.
brokenarms wrote: » It should be equal. For every worker. Regardless of experience.
bebeman wrote: » Go into any DB depot on a thursday and you will see new drivers lined up out side the managers office, they are there to explain what happen in the accidents they were in. Thats a fact, any driver who posts here can verify this.