MileHighGuy wrote: » Yes, Vick is the closest analogue, but he didn't light it up in his NFL debut the same way, he was eased in and had plenty of growing pains. Griffin just came in and blew away a good Saints team. Also, in Griffin's case, he was using his athleticism and putting himself in terrible situations, trying to beat players to the edge and getting blown up, thinking he could juke two and three defenders in the middle of the field and getting blindsided. He just didn't seem to have awareness on the field, exciting as hell, but he was no Cam Newton when it came to absorbing hits (Newton is now finding out that even he can't take that level of punishment week in, week out)
The Reservoir Dubs Anchorman wrote: » . Can we beat the Raiders at home this weekend?
jack presley wrote: » Hopefully they can but there are two things you can be sure of in the Jay Gruden era. 1 they will come out flat in week 1, and 2 more often than not, they don’t turn up for prime time games (3-6)
The Reservoir Dubs Anchorman wrote: » But it's all off the main stay of focus at the moment. Can we beat the Raiders at home this weekend? Personally I think we can. As long as Reed gets over this chest contusion thing and suits up, if he doesnt it makes it more difficult. This one could turn into a shoot out.
jack presley wrote: » Raiders 0-11 on third downs. Wow.
Morrison J wrote: » Amazing the difference when you've a defensive coordinator who knows what he's doing. Joe Barry and Jim Haslett held us back for years.
The Reservoir Dubs Anchorman wrote: » Morrison J wrote: » Amazing the difference when you've a defensive coordinator who knows what he's doing. Joe Barry and Jim Haslett held us back for years. Eh lets not get ahead of ourselves. Last night was decent but the Raiders were shockingly bad. The key for me though is that we're definitely moving in the right direction.
Morrison J wrote: » Is saying Joe Barry and Jim Haslett were completely inept getting ahead of myself? I have quite the evidence to back that up!
Morrison J wrote: » And then Gruden ****s up the clock management at the end.. Tough loss but we actually look pretty good. Penalties and injuries cost us big time. Pretty positive stuff.
shamrock55 wrote: » With doctsons catch,he had controll until he hit the ground when it then squirmed out,where's the problem?
jack presley wrote: » Dropping like flies. Mason Foster done for the year.
jack presley wrote: » I don't know what to make of that game last night. With all the players missing before the game even started and then them losing a couple of others in the first half, they shouldn't have had a chance to win that game and I was expecting a loss but they actually could have and maybe even should have won the game. But as usual (and I'm like a scratched record here), the inability to turn good drives into TDs killed them again and a few stupid mistakes and they let another one slip away. Gonna be tough now, Seattle on the road then Minnesota and NO, could be 3-7 in a few weeks.
gerryfed wrote: » I'd take an L this week if it gave us another bye week :P no team can compete with all those injuries, specially on the OLine. The blocked field goal was huge for me. Then the weather kicked in and it made coming from behind even tougher. Passing game is so up and down, it's insane.
jack presley wrote: » It’s all up and down unfortunately but when you’ve no OL you’re up against it from the get go. But yeah, that drive stalling and having to take the FG that was blocked changed the game completely. I heard Kirk being interviewed yesterday and he was saying the first time he met one of the new backup linemen was in the dressing room before the game. Sad to see Mack Brown leave as I don’t rate Rob Kelly and would have liked to see him get a shot. One less team in the mix now for Cousins with the NE/SF trade but I still see him walking next season.