SEPT 23 1989 wrote: » I would prefer a good carvery and a few pints
Fr_Dougal wrote: » Seems a little bit crass to talk about Michelin * restaurants when some people are still barely getting by, in my opinion.
Fr_Dougal wrote: Seems a little bit crass to talk about Michelin * restaurants when some people are still barely getting by, in my opinion.
backspin. wrote: » €25 for a steak is the most i will pay for a main course anywhere. So i wouldn't even eat in a michelin 1 star.
mariaalice wrote: » I suspect people are not just going for the food its an 'experience'.
Kase Juicy Donkey wrote: » Went to a couple of Michelin 1 star restaurants, one was an Indian, fantastic food and a decent price too, but for myself to spend 500 yoyo's on a meal would be madness. That's a day's pay ffs.
Kase Juicy Donkey wrote: » Based on what? Income alone? Silly to ignore other variables. 500 for one meal while on 100K a year is stupid. People here think 100K a year is this holy grail, like super wealthy. It's not even close.
GhostyMcGhost wrote: » and heading straight to Burger King afterwards is some experience alright
Theboinkmaster wrote: » Stupid post, utter ignorance. Eat a 5 course tasting menu in Chapter One and you'd be absolutely stuffed, the food is extremely rich so portions are small.
nocoverart wrote: » A big enough figure to stealth boast about all the same.
Kase Juicy Donkey wrote: Went to a couple of Michelin 1 star restaurants, one was an Indian, fantastic food and a decent price too, but for myself to spend 500 yoyo's on a meal would be madness. That's a day's pay ffs.
Kase Juicy Donkey wrote: » People here think 100K a year is this holy grail, like super wealthy. It's not even close.
rawn wrote: » That's more than a weeks pay for most of us!
dav3 wrote: »