SafeSurfer wrote: » Anyone except Amnesty International Ireland.
gctest50 wrote: » SafeSurfer wrote: » Anyone except Amnesty International Ireland. What's wrong with Amnesty International Ireland
Puteq wrote: » Hi, I was wondering what're peoples thoughts on the best charity to donate to? I'm thinking some third world charity where you'd probably get more out of your donation and obviously some charity with a good rating where a decent amount of a donation goes towards the cause. Googling it leaves me more confused, and all charity rating websites seem to be US based and full of charities I never heard of so I just don't know. Any advice would be appreciated!
Puteq wrote: » Wow are they that bad!? Thats kind of why I asked this question...
Concern, which works on fighting poverty, also performs strongly, and says it puts 91.1 cent of every €1 donated towards charitable works, keeping governance costs at just 0.5 per cent. So does Trocaire, another NGO, which also keeps the proportion of each donation that goes to charitable work north of 90 per cent.
She advised that anybody who wants to help out can donate to an existing account in Dan O’Brien Butchers in Northside Shopping Centre. We all cook very Monday night from our homes and make sandwiches, collect clothes, toiletries, and sleeping bags. It all comes out of our own pockets as we are not registered. We are not allowed to take cash, only vouchers.
SafeSurfer wrote: » Nearly 70% of funds raised go on staff salaries for one thing.
Its call for a “human rights compliant abortion law” cost €160,687 during the second half of 2016. And a further €114,776 went on a ‘My Body, My Rights’ crusade, which focused on reproductive rights concerns in Ireland, Nepal, Burkina Faso, El Salvador, Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia.
gctest50 wrote: » SafeSurfer wrote: » Nearly 70% of funds raised go on staff salaries for one thing. Is there more :eek:
SafeSurfer wrote: » ............. Since they started accepting large donations from certain organisations ..........
gctest50 wrote: » Someone leading them astray ? Who ? :eek:
First Up wrote: » Amnesty isn't a charity strictly speaking. They are more pressure group that finds and supports prisoners of conscience. You need people with skills and languages to do that so it isn't fair to compare them to aid type organisations.
SafeSurfer wrote: » Amnesty are a charity. What special skills and foreign languages are required for the campaigns that make up the bulk of their spending? ........
.............a further €114,776 went on a ‘My Body, My Rights’ crusade, which focused on reproductive rights concerns in Ireland, Nepal, Burkina Faso, El Salvador, Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia..........
SafeSurfer wrote: Amnesty are a charity. What special skills and foreign languages are required for the campaigns that make up the bulk of their spending?
lazybones32 wrote: They could solve the homeless crisis here with that money if they wanted to but i guess the EU wants the money spent/sent elsewhere.
First Up wrote: » We are signed up to the UN commitment to spend 0.7% of GDP on international development. Nothing to do with the EU.
SafeSurfer wrote: » Amnesty are a charity. What special skills and foreign languages are required for the campaigns that make up the bulk of their spending?https://www.thesun.ie/news/1630446/abortion-is-amnesty-internationals-top-campaign-priority-in-ireland-as-charity-spent-e275k-on-the-issue-last-year/
Arsemageddon wrote: » SafeSurfer wrote: » Amnesty are a charity. What special skills and foreign languages are required for the campaigns that make up the bulk of their spending?https://www.thesun.ie/news/1630446/abortion-is-amnesty-internationals-top-campaign-priority-in-ireland-as-charity-spent-e275k-on-the-issue-last-year/ You are completely missing the point. While Amnesty are indeed registered as a charitable organisation their role is to advocate not to provide food aid. Not all charities have the same function.
SafeSurfer wrote: » Why do believe that provision of food aid is a necessary criteria for charitable status?
Arsemageddon wrote: » SafeSurfer wrote: » Why do believe that provision of food aid is a necessary criteria for charitable status? I think it should be pretty bloody obvious that I don't
SafeSurfer wrote: » Would you agree that their advocacy now reflects the aims of their benefactors?