PaulKK wrote: » http://www.kilkennypeople.ie/news/kilkenny-news/272348/two-sections-of-m9-motorway-in-kilkenny-to-close-for-six-days-of-maintenance-work.html Not surprising. Back to the old road again. How come they can't get this piece of road right?
fg1406 wrote: » Must be an annual thing at this stage?
fricatus wrote: » Anyone know what the hell the Gardaí were doing at the layby south of Mullinavat just heading into Waterford this afternoon? The motorway was limited to one lane by cones and there were multiple cars there with the blue lights flashing, including an Audi SUV from the Armed Support Unit.
Multi Agency C-point on M9. Multiple offences detected on truck including defective tyres & lights. Court to follow
road_high wrote: » M9 motorway going to be closed at various times and various stages between J7 and J9 next week;http://www.kilkennycoco.ie/eng/RSSLatestNewsAndAnnouncements/Road-Closure-M9-Southbound-from-J8-Kilkenny-North-to-J9-Danesfort-8-am-to-8-pm-Wednesday-11th-of-Oct.54364.shortcut.html What are they doing? The closures appear pretty short in duration for anything substantial?
sea12 wrote: » Traffic diverted through Kilkenny ring road this morning. Big delays as a result.
BelfastVanMan wrote: » Can someone explain to me why the N10 north of Kilkenny is not under motorway restrictions, as it leads to the M9 and nowhere else?
marno21 wrote: » It should be signed as M9 outbound and N10 inbound. It's effectively a spur of the M9, so it is the M9 outbound and it leads to the N10 inbound.
PaulKK wrote: » Agreed. Always thought it was a mistake not to make this 100km/hr dual carriageway when they had the chance also. A bit of future planning wouldn't have gone astray.
road_high wrote: » PaulKK wrote: » Agreed. Always thought it was a mistake not to make this 100km/hr dual carriageway when they had the chance also. A bit of future planning wouldn't have gone astray. Defo should be dual carriageway. I'd say the traffic figures justify one. Silly when they were building it day one. They had traffic counters on it during the summer actually.
BelfastVanMan wrote: » It could be given the 2+2 treatment pretty easily, from what I can see.
PaulKK wrote: » In parts true enough but the two overpass bridges I think may not have quite enough room for 2+2 between supports. Seems like building it right in the first place would not have added much additional cost and it would have made a proper job of it.
CeilingFly wrote: » Planning granted for new off line services at Mullinavat. A little smaller than Paulstown Applegreen, but very similar in style. Permission granted to landowner, but I'll guess Applegreen are behind it.
hi5 wrote: » I would have thought Knocktopher would be better positioned from a spacing point of view, Mullinavat is not that far from Waterford.
CeilingFly wrote: » Not really - think of all the bellview port traffic and traffic from dungarvan using the bypass. On top of that there's no fuel station in Mullinavat. So perfect location imo.
rameire wrote: » The Kilcullen services will be majorly beneficial for Athy Traffic that use the new link road to the M9.
road_high wrote: » Yes but Mullinavat is the next junction up the M9. It's not on the N25 junction so won't necessarily get that traffic.