Are Am Eye wrote: » Your just waffling the same points. You cannot contradict the fact that there are substances that when introduced to the body through food have an anti-oxidant effect on harmful free radicals.That's a fact whether you like it or not.
_Dara_ wrote: » No, it's completely true. If your liver isn't up to the job of detoxification, you're in big trouble and no diet will save you.
thelad95 wrote: » That jet fuel can melt steel beams.
wakka12 wrote: » Obviously the liver is necessary and the chief processor of toxins. but certain foods do help to combat harmful effects of free radicals within the body. Theres mountains of research and thousands of doctors backing it up btw, its not like its a flavour of the month health fad bro science
_Dara_ wrote: » I'd love to see you produce some scientific papers which prove that fact. Papers that have measured the biological activity of detox diet foods within the body and show the effects the detox diet has. Bioavailability is key. A fruit containing an antioxidant doesn't mean that it has an antioxidant effect once in the body. There is a lot of literature out there on why detox diets are nonsense. Read up on it. OR dismiss my points. Totally up to you, no skin off my nose at all.
FizzleSticks wrote: » This post has been deleted.
Are Am Eye wrote: » You're the one contending that no substance introduce to the body via food can eliminate a toxin. A very brave and unorthodox contention. You have presented no research to back up your strange assertions. The process of anti-oxidation is long known and widely accepted. The fact that your only reference is to another 'discussion' (ha ha) shows the poverty of facts to back up your unconventional ideas.
_Dara_ wrote: » I had no worries about finding information to back up my point and it didn't take long to strike gold. Brave and unorthodox, not really. Common knowledge more like. Posted above but here again is a literature review from 2015 which has surveyed the scientific research available on the subject as of that year. It notes that it is a poorly studied area (as of then, there had been no proper randomised studies) and that the only studied which shows that the detox diets could have an effect were small sample sizes and poorly designed. A review of this kind would collate all the available studies on the subject at that particular time. And it's only two years ago.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25522674 In PDF form: https://www.bodybuilding-natural.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Detox-diets-for-toxin-elimination-and-weight-management-a-critical-review-of-the-evidence.pdf Look at its bibliography and use it as a jumping off point for further reading if you are interested. Have you got anything at all to back up what you say?
tomwaterford wrote: » I think it's Adidas and puma that are run by two brothers??
Are Am Eye wrote: » Your using "detox diets" - something I never mentioned, have no interest in, and don't give a sh1t about, as a strawman to divert from the fact that you were shown to be wrong on the plain and simple and irrefutable fact that anti-oxidants in food eliminate free radicals in the body. Now, Dara, think of some new clever way you can divert from the fact that you are completely wrong.
_Dara_ wrote: » You have a brass neck, I'll give you that. Now you thick . Now where's your Ferris Bueller. And yet, I note, still nothing at all produced yourself by way of research. You have quite literally not shown me to be wrong at all. Nothing. Nada. You've blustered about how I've been proven wrong, sure. Talk is cheap. Have you got anything to back up what you say? Anything? Anything? Bueller?
Are Am Eye wrote: » Wall of text
_Dara_ wrote: » Summarise, what were the findings? Titles alone aren't illuminating.
PanicStations wrote: » Both the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Food Safety Authority have published guidance disallowing food product labels to claim an inferred antioxidant benefit when no such physiological evidence exists. "Antioxidants”, i.e. non-nutrient compounds in foods, such as polyphenols, have an antioxidant capacity in vitro but other than Vitamins A, C and E – no food compounds have been proved with antioxidant efficacy in vivo. So Are Am Eye, can you please explain what you know that the US FDA and EFSA don't know?
Are Am Eye wrote: » You can read the findings if you like. You're the one bluffing. You've been given the facts. You've been given the references. Is it time for your baby ego to grow up and accept that your wrong?
Anita Blow wrote: » That teachers have long paid holidays
_Dara_ wrote: » Not at all. Detox diets don't do anything above and beyond what a normal, healthy diet does. I even said earlier that healthy eating was all that was needed. Detox diets are a marketing ploy and can be downright dangerous. And, once again, if your liver isn't able to detoxify, you'll need to pay your doctor a visit. And what PanicStations said also. If solid evidence existed they'd have no problem with food labels mentioning it. So, nope, I completely stand by detox diets being complete and utter bunkum that prey on the gullible.
Are Am Eye wrote: » You're still hiding behind the strawman of 'detox diets.' You would love it if I was advocating 'detox diet's Sadly for you I'm not. Anyone can debunk bullsh1t diets. It would be so great for you if I was advocating a diet. Then you wouldn't be so stupibdly wrong. It would all be so easy. But as has been said to you in three previous posts, I can start drawing pictures for you if necessary, you are very slow on the uptake. Nothing to do with diets. The simple fact, that I've referenced and sourced, is that Anti-Oxidants in food have an effect on free radicals in the body. That's been said to you lots of times and you're pretending to ignore it. Because you have no answer to it.
Are Am Eye wrote: » You're still hiding behind the strawman of 'detox diets.'