Bluesquare wrote: » Your very patient - after one days experience my head was melted . Although I'm liking this new average heart rate setting! You can join me on sub 4 quest for DCM next year ......... Just need to find the right plan!
eyrie wrote: » Oh but just think how much easier the second one is bound to be! (I assume, based on no experience whatsoever ) People aren't lying when they say it's a bug are they??
eyrie wrote: » Saturday 16th - Unplanned Rest Day A VERY late night the previous night (and far too many glasses of wine) put paid to my grand plan of an early morning long run. After that it was travelling all day so no opportunity for one either. Headed to Cork to see The National in the opera house. What a gig! Worth missing a run for Mileage for the week: 24 Lower than I had intended, but not the end of the world.
Huzzah! wrote: » Five days' running seems like a decent week to me. Very jealous you were at The National gig. What a band!
eyrie wrote: » Are you feeling any better now?
gypsylee wrote: » Oh God love you! Not a great start to your work day. Hope the day improves for you.
Younganne wrote: » eyrie just came across your log today. Congrats on the R&R, a great debut half and a great report. You will see your times coming down the more running you do. You have great patience, I'd have giving up the HAAD after week one:o It will stand to you and you will be delighted with the results. Regarding your weekend and studying, it might be a good idea to schedule a short run in, as it will refresh you, give you a break from study and it will make you feel less guilty. I will be following the log and your progress with interest, my original PBs were very similar to yours and some days I can't believe how far I've come. Happy Running.
eyrie wrote: » Starting to think that sleep is a decisive factor for me re: pace/effort level. Everything is noticeably easier for me on a consistent basis on Sunday runs, and I think it has to be because I've slept more. I'm a really bad sleeper during the week. It's something I'd love to improve but don't really know how. Getting up early to run doesn't help either...
eyrie wrote: » Have to stick up a reminder here, for myself as much as anything, that I'm supposed to be running all runs between 140-145 HR, up to max 150 at a push. I completely failed at this so far this week so need to cop on and be more disciplined with it.
The Muppet wrote: » So it's not just me that gets carried away, I struggle with the discipline to run at the proper paces most days too , It ain't easy.
eyrie wrote: » Have to stick up a reminder here, for myself as much as anything, that I'm supposed to be running all runs between 140-145 HR, up to max 150 at a push. I completely failed at this so far this week so need to cop on and be more disciplined with it.Monday 23rd - Pilates + 4.65 miles / 11:49 avg pace / 144 (155) HR avg (max)Ran home from work with the backpack. Started fine but felt a bit off from the second mile onwards. Let HR get a bit away from me too. On the bright side, I finally got the nod to move up to intermediate pilates, woo!Tuesday 24th - 5.02 miles / 11:49 avg pace / 147 (154) HR avg (max)Eeek, no excuses for this one. Morning run to work with backpack. Felt pretty awful really, heavy legs and effort way out of proportion to pace. It was windy and humid, and that definitely played a part.Wednesday 25th - 4.28 miles / 12:05 avg pace / 152 (163) HR avg (max) - !!! Failure of technology. At least I think that's the only way to explain this one. HR was a good 15-20 beats higher than normal for the same pace throughout, despite everything feeling mostly very easy. Felt a bit weird/woozy in a few patches but that may have been psychological due to the watch apparently telling me I was about to spontaneously combust!Thursday 26th - Rest After the weirdness of Wednesday I decided to take a rest day. I'm still hoping it was down to watch misbehaviour but given that Monday and Tuesday's runs both felt fairly crap I decided to take a break and reset! Getting very excited on behalf of everyone running on Sunday! I will be out watching and cheering, and probably getting very carried away imagining myself being on the other side of the spectator line next year! Hoping it's a great day for everyone running
eyrie wrote: » Thoughts: I'm really starting to question this whole HADD training experiment. I don't feel like it's working for me. My heart rate seems to be really erratic and I often feel like I'm getting more sluggish and unfit rather than less..
The Muppet wrote: » The discipline to run by heart rate is tough , I couldn't hack it myself , I've tried a few times but there are a few runners here who stuck with it and found it very good, I know annie get your run used it and I think Ososlo did a few years ago too. If you are running for enjoyment and not enjoying the sessions it doesn't really make sense to stick with it.
Huzzah! wrote: » HADD's tough. I ultimately came to the conclusion that it wasn't for me, mainly because running is a hobby and it's supposed to be enjoyable.
The Muppet wrote: » If you are running for enjoyment and not enjoying the sessions it doesn't really make sense to stick with it.
Annie get your Run wrote: » It's probably a good idea to knock it on the head if you're not enjoying it! There are other ways to train by HR and I'm a big fan of that in general so don't let HADD put you off .
TFBubendorfer wrote: » HADD (or a similar training) worked very well for me. But you have to take into account that running with a backpack, especially a heavy one, will severely impact on your HR and your effort. To be honest, when running with a backpack I'd just completely ignore pace and HR and just get the run done while ignoring the numbers.