511 wrote: » Great memory, but brutal commentator. He never knew anything about the sport he commentated and tried to overcompensate for this reminiscing about past experiences at previous event he attended. Any auld gobshíte can utter "different class" twice when a player is dribbling with the ball. People citing that as an example of his legendary commentary have really low standards.
fryup wrote: » does this mean he won't be doing the Olympics in Tokyo ?* sorry, too soon?
511 wrote: » Great memory, but brutal commentator. He never knew anything about the sport he commentated and tried to overcompensate for this reminiscing about past experiences at previous event he attended. Any auld gobsh can utter "different class" twice when a player is dribbling with the ball. People citing that as an example of his legendary commentary have really low standards.
Atoms for Peace wrote: » Give me Jimmy McGee any day over today's "pundits", a bunch of constipated experts pointing at a touch screen while reeling off stats is actually quite boring. He had wit, charisma and was a genuinely sound bloke; things which seem to be leaving sport and replaced with dour commercialism.
Hermy wrote: » So he championed the cheats at the expense of the honest endeavour of those who tried to compete clean and derided those who tried to expose the cheating. That's not idealism.
Hermy wrote: » Sorry Joe - my comment was a criticism of Magee - not of your post. A man with his years of experience in sport would have to be awfully naive to believe Armstrong was clean. But nonetheless he chose to pull the wool over his own eyes for whatever reason.
Hermy wrote: » my comment was a criticism of Magee... A man with his years of experience in sport would have to be awfully naive to believe Armstrong was clean. But nonetheless he chose to pull the wool over his own eyes for whatever reason.
Hermy wrote: » But Magee wanted us to respect the cheats...
paleoperson wrote: » Did he really deserve the title "memory man" though? He was on a sports quiz show there a few years ago and didn't do much, despite how it's his whole life to know sports. Maybe his memory got fuzzy as he got older? I wouldn't bring it up except that also they literally titled his book also a few years ago "The Memory Man" and pushed it as a big selling point about him. I think he just got seriously into sport and so was able to remember sporting facts, then they started to push this. And maybe I'm reaching, but I also suspect there's some other legendary sporting commentator in the UK or America who was known until his death for an incredible memory, and they tried to copy that.
YFlyer wrote: » You're farting there.
Hermy wrote: » A man with his years of experience in sport would have to be awfully naive to believe Armstrong was clean. But nonetheless he chose to pull the wool over his own eyes for whatever reason.
Chivito550 wrote: » Jimmy always struck me as a very positive person, who didn't have a bad word to say about anyone, who always tried to see the good in people. He also comes from a very innocent time when the use of PEDs weren't really known to the wider public