Arghus wrote: » Enough with the volley talk!
Raoul wrote: » Ah, it is funny. I agree with Eoin btw. :pac:
Say Your Number wrote: » I remember Ken saying way back on OTB that when he was 5 he played a game of Gaelic Football and he kicked the ball into his own net and everyone started giving out to him and he's had a negative association to it since, I don't think he hates it, he seems more indifferent towards it.
Pete Moss wrote: » Found yesterday's soccer podcast to be a bit limp. It seemed to take a while to actually get into the analysis of the weekend's action, then when they did, the Mourinho talk at the start all felt a bit clichÃ႒©d at this stage. In saying that, I don't usually mind when Ken goes on a Mou rant. He Mou rage can be quite funny.
Ol' Donie wrote: » I've had the f*ckin Aul Triangle in my head for days now. Starting to grate at this stage. De screw was from Mayoooo He said Hey, Galileiooooo Hehehehe
Brock Turnpike wrote: » Won't be sorry to see the back of the GAA coverage now that the season has ended.
Arghus wrote: » Braved the waters of the Paul Galvin interview: It started off quite well, but things took a nausea inducing turn when Paul referred to Dunnes Stores as a "cultural institution" and started going off about how he prefers to think of himself of a storyteller - one who mainly works through the medium of flogging derivative genseais and onesies and the like, largely, I'd imagine, to misguided mammies on behalf of sons who are glad that someone bought them some clothes, otherwise they'd have to do it themselves. He talked the talk - he was "conceptual" and saw the purpose of his tales, manifested in fabric, as being one of "elevation" - but the only time when his burring monotone rose with any sincere feeling was when he assured Ritchie that the most important thing about his gear was that it "sells and sells and sells." You're a hack Galvin! A hack!
lawred2 wrote: » Today's pod was short by second captains standards yet was more than half made up covering Jimmy McGee's passing. Now there's no way they could have planned for that.. so what would the podcast have been without that happening?
Pter wrote: » Enjoyed Kens latest political podcast. Good food for thought!
dastardly00 wrote: » About halfway through it at the moment and I am enjoying it
Raisins wrote: » There was nothing in it that you wouldn't hear in the pub. Usually his political pods a challenge a perspective or give an in depth analysis. Eoin said previously they avoid discussing referring decisions on the sport pod because all that chat is covered elsewhere and it leads nowhere. This pod was the political equivalent of Robbie savage discussing refereeing decisions for an hour.
Raisins wrote: There was nothing in it that you wouldn't hear in the pub. Usually his political pods a challenge a perspective or give an in depth analysis.
Raisins wrote: Eoin said previously they avoid discussing referring decisions on the sport pod because all that chat is covered elsewhere and it leads nowhere. This pod was the political equivalent of Robbie savage discussing refereeing decisions for an hour.
Cartman78 wrote: » Anyone have info/stats on how the subscription model is working out for them?
WhatsGoingOn2 wrote: » They have 8,370 subscribers, so working out pretty well..