jcd5971 wrote: » no he wont diaz brothers are the type to cut off their nose to spite their face, so no way he fights for a low figure like 5m. diaz knows mcgregor still wants that difinitive 3rd fight, and he'll bleed them all to get it.
The Nal wrote: » Nate will take whatever hes given. He earned €500k from the first fight and €3m from the 2nd fight. Hes lost 11/30 fights and lost 6 of his last 12. Hes a journeyman so he'll take €5m or whatever it will be for this fight, as it'll be a title fight, or they'll just give it to Ferguson/Lee.
Useful.Idiot wrote: » Yep it was everywhere. I reckon I was fairly casual back then and it was fairly prominent on social media. I do agree the winner of Tony v Lee really need to shine on the mic to create a bit more of a buzz for a unification bout. Maybe if Nate's money demands are too far-fetched the UFC could go for the winner of that bout first if it seems like a viable alternative.
kwestfan08 wrote: » Maybe I'm misrembering but I seem to rememeber that rant veing everywhere the day after and not just on MMA sites. Yeah it was such an open goal for Tony that night. Why he didn't say anything is beyond me.
Ultimate Seduction wrote: » Don't think any casuals seen that Nate rant until he was announced as RDAs replacement. Ferguson had the chance to call him out after beating RDA but he just shouted viva Mexico.. No one knows who Kevin Lee is
kwestfan08 wrote: » It's all about how they are on the mic after they win. It has to be a proper call out like Nate did when he beat Michael Johnson. That's what goes viral and gets spread around to the more casual fight fan to build interest.
Spudman_20000 wrote: » If Ferguson vs Lee is a barn burner with a clear winner, surely Conor will be under pressure to face the winner, rather than a third fight with Nate? Ferguson and Lee really need to stake their claim to be next in line.
Lukker- wrote: » Dana has denied it,
Subcomandante Marcos wrote: » Told ye lads, it's happening. If you want to go, get on it soon before the flights go up in price.https://www.balls.ie/newsnow/conor-mcgregor-next-fight-2-374249 Nate has been back in camp since the middle of august, doing a lot of work with Perez and sparring with guys from Andre Ward's Kings gym.
BOHtox wrote: » A year for a "your ma" joke isn't great tbh. I've seen better comebacks over in After Hours at 4am in the morning.
Ultimate Seduction wrote: » Love how it says McGregor trash talked his way to two titles. He didn't knockout both champions ��
CatFromHue wrote: » paul is on the record saying that MMA repluses him. he is also on the record for saying that it's practitioners and supporters fascinate him. he has been to an MMA event as he wrote about a Dylan Tuke fight, so it is a bit strange he doesn't know how many rounds are in a fight. him with JKhttp://www.independent.ie/sport/columnists/paul-kimmage/paul-kimmage-meets-john-kavanagh-my-friendship-with-conor-battling-mcgeeney-and-how-we-blagged-our-way-into-jlos-party-35133838.html him on the Tuke fighthttp://www.independent.ie/sport/columnists/paul-kimmage/paul-kimmage-as-you-watch-them-embrace-and-listen-to-the-sobbing-there-are-tears-running-down-your-face-35302327.html
drugstore cowboy wrote: » There was a McGregor special with Paul Kimmage being interviewed by Dunphy on his podcast The Stand. It's strange such a celebrated sports journalist like Kimmage was stumbling to answer how many rounds there are in a UFC fight!
LollipopJimmy wrote: » Jeremy Stephens comeback was almost worth the wait #YourMomKnowsWhoDaFook
billybonkers wrote: » http://www.telegraph.co.uk/mma/2017/09/20/conor-mcgregor-address-us-congress-rights-campaign-mma-fighters/ Conor to address congress on MMA fighters rights....
